Laserfiche WebLink
January 14, 2003 <br />HWA Proiect No.2002.146-21 <br />practical, fixed leads should be utilized to reduce the potential for the pile being driven <br />out of alignmrnt. <br />We recommend a total of 8 test piles be driven initially, to detertnine the field conditions <br />in conjunction with the conVactor's pile driving equipment. Test piles should be <br />distributed across the building with at least one at each comer and in the middle. The test <br />piles should be located such that they may also serve as production piles. No less than 24 <br />hours after initial driving, the test piles should be re-struck. Ultimate capacities of these <br />piles should then be evaluated using penetration resistance duting re-striking. <br />We recommend use of the dynamic pile driving analyzer (PDA) on the test piles to <br />monitor their dynamic behavior during initial driving and re-striking. The design <br />recommendation may be revised if necessary based on resul!s of the PDA evaluation. <br />In addition, the PDA data can be utilized to determine appropriate pile driving critecia <br />for end of initial driving (EOID) conditions, thus reducing the number of piles <br />requiring re-striking. <br />Following completion of the test pile program, the geotechnical engineer should provide <br />final driving resistance field criteria, using an appropriate dynamic pile driving analysis. <br />Typically, penetration resistance at the end of initial driving is lower than during re- <br />sttiking. However, it is not practical to re-strike every new pile after installatiun to <br />estimate ultimate capacity. In our opinion, a minimum penetration resistance should be <br />established for the EOID condition during produccion pile driving, based on the results <br />of Ihe PDA data from the test pile program. In addition, a minimum of 10 percent of <br />the production piles should be re-st:vck. The geotechnical engineer should select piles <br />designated for re-striking, and the re-strikes should be performed at least 24 hours after <br />driving. <br />4.4 SETTLE11fENT <br />4.4.1 General <br />There aze several settlement issues at this site caused by rivo different compressible layers <br />and a variety of loading conditions. Boring BH-1 indicates a compressible layer was <br />encountered near the surface between depths of about 8 and 23 feet and a second <br />compressible layer encountered between dep;hs of about 55 and 95 feet. <br />From the site and exploration plan dated October 2002, the existing �ound surface <br />elevation is about l2 feet along the southwest side of the building and about S feet neaz <br />the south comer. The building finished floor elevation is 16.95. The building fnished <br />floor is therefore about 5 to 9 feet above existing grade. There is a driveway and pazking <br />area that surrounds most of the southwest and southeast sides of the building which <br />appcars to be slightly below the building floor level at the building and at natural grade <br />:002146 rqwn - final ]] 1{WA GEOSCIENCES INC. <br />�� <br />