Laserfiche WebLink
t <br />��� <br />b. Conclueions: <br />The granting of a variance vould be contrary to the Compreheneive <br />Plan in that it would result in an increaee in deneity in an arew <br />vhich the Compreheneive Plan does not permit any further <br />concentration. It would alao not aid in the preservation aad <br />protection of the single family neighborhoods• Thn grenting of <br />the variance vould be in derogation of che Comprehensive Plan. <br />NOA, 1'��FORE, the Board of Adjuetment of the City of Everett does <br />hereby find that the variance request of the Applicant ia denied for failure <br />to get the needed majority vote. Further be it ordered that the Applicant <br />must comett the exieting etructure into a aingle family residence within <br />aiaty (60) days of the date of thie Order. <br />DATED thie �_ daq of S�i� • , 1984. <br />/�C,.� �- �,�._..i <br />�a1�n, 8oard of Adju'stment ' <br />�wo�Af�v"""'"_ <br />Everett Mi ler <br />-3- <br />