5512 S 1ST AVE 2016-01-01 MF Import

G� UI�U ''Yirj. i,,i L, i� �,:,� �� iss�a BOARD OF ADJDSTMENT _ .... . __. n.FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND ORDER '�TY 0` L1/FRFT, � �'sT �-vr�.� (Dennis V. Diedrich; U20-84) Based upon the �aritte❑ request for a variance from the City's zoning I code, specifically EMC 19.16.030, made bq Dennis V. Diedrich, hereinafter referred to as "Applicant," the IIoard of Adjustmeot held a public hearing on said application o¢ September 10, 1984. Following said hearing, a motion vas made and eeconded to grant the variance request. Board membera Wilson and Zook voted for the granting of the variance �+hile board members Miller and Hoagland voted againa[ granting the variance. The baeis for the board membersl voting against the granting of the variance is as fol.locrs: 1, There are no exceptional or extraordinary circumatances or conditionsl ap�rlying to the subject property or as to the intended use thereof, that do not apply generally to ocher properties in the same vicinity or zone: a. b. Findinge: � The Applicant � � s a parcel of property which ia located at 5512 South Firet �t, Everett. The Applicant's property conaiats of a-6,a 0 equare foot lot which le zoned R-Z• � 000 s uare allovs ai.ngle family renidences to be located oa 5, q foot lots and duplexes to be located on 7,500 ayunre foot lots (EMC 19.16.030). The other lots in Applicant's block have single family residences on Lhem. Applicant's property containa no conditions such ae shape or topographical locatton vhich are unique to hie lot. Applicant ie seeking a variance to allov a duplex on a 6,000 aquare foot lots. The Applicant hae a aingle family structure on the subject property which has been converted to a triplex and lican[ rofnthe being used as a duplex. The conversions by the App structure in question toak place wlthout tVie required City permita. Conclusions: The Applicant's property does not contain any phyeical conditiona or circumstances unique to his property for which a variance can be granted. Applicant�e current use is in violation of the City's zoning code. The only harJahip which the applicant has demonstrated is due to the fact that he now is operating a dupleA atructure where such is not permltted unless t:he Applicant has � lot of 7,500 square feet or largtr. :.�t this cannot be considered an excep[1ona1 or extraordinary circumEtance becausE the only reason the Applicant is in this 3ltuation ia that he haE not complied vith the City ordinances. 'Phis constitutes : self-created hardship which does not consti:ute undue hardshi� for purposes of the City's zoning code. -1- z c. -i c� m .. �. -i -+� ... -a in - m 0 co mo �c om i -z+ �� oz c r i �� � T on z -1 r� mv o� c �n m `'� z c: � �, r � _, a � � � c` c= r�