My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
4205 S 3RD AVE 2018-01-02 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
S 3RD AVE
>
4205
>
4205 S 3RD AVE 2018-01-02 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/4/2022 3:58:42 PM
Creation date
3/8/2017 12:46:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
S 3RD AVE
Street Number
4205
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
90
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i- e 6 T H U _ o: 3 0 C A S C A D E TES. P.03 <br />CASCADE GEOTECHNICAL <br />May 21 1988 <br />Job No. 884-21G <br />Town 4 Country Steel Buildings <br />Page 2 <br />southeast quarter of the building area at a depth of approximate- <br />ly two (2) feet below the existing surface of the fill pad. Teat <br />02 was performed on the surface in the northwest quarter of the <br />building area. A sample of the fill soil was taken to our labora- <br />tory for Proctor moisture density relationship analysis. The <br />in -place density test results are presented at the end of this <br />letter. <br />The thickness and condition of the fill soil in the building area <br />and the native subgrade soils were observed by excavating a backhoe <br />test pit. The test pit showed approximately four (4) feet of <br />fill overlying native sand and silty sand. The observed fill <br />material was firm and appeared to be well compacted. The native <br />sand and silty sand was light brown, medium dense to dense and <br />moist. The native soil observed in the test pit may be used for a <br />bearing capacity of 2000 p.s.f. if the soil is undisturbed and <br />free of organic material. <br />A test pit adjacent to the north ecology block wall indicated that <br />the blocks in the immediate area had been placed on the firm native <br />sand and silty sand. The areas outside the proposed building area <br />on the east and south sides were inaccessible to the backhoe. <br />However, the topography of the site outside the building area <br />suggests that the building area had been excavated to the native <br />sand and silty sand prior to the placement of the ecology block <br />perimeter wall. <br />We did not observe site preparation or fill placement, nor have we <br />analyzed the ecology block retaining system. All soils and fills <br />observed or tested are consistent with good construction proce- <br />dures. We would expect conditions elsewhere on the site to be <br />similiar. However, it must be recognized that variations may <br />occur. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.