5005 S 3RD AVE 2016-01-01 MF Import

, ., ; a•. 13oard oS Adjustment hlinutes -- pnge three A hearing was held ot� the applic,xt.ion of Jolin J.unieson, 221�J Pult:on, Evcretit, WA 98201 for a variance f.rom Sectiion 19.1G.030 of the ]iverett hfuni.cipal. Code �linimum Lot Size, for permissi.on to construct a duplex and p mvidc G,000 square teeti of lot area rather than Lhe code re- quirement of 7,500 square feet oi' ].ot area. Legal Descri.ption: Lots 25 and 26, 137oc1r 2 SmyCh Lxnd Co. first addition. Address: 2219 fulton Zoning: R-2 Single Family }Iigh llensi.Cy Residence Dir. & rirs. Jamieson represented tl�emselves and made the Sollo�ving statements: 1. There have been other variances for duplexes granted in in til�e area �vith 6,000 square 1'eet. 2. Tl�e esisting house does encroach on the side yard of Lot 25 to Lhe South. 3. The proposed house would Ue constr.ucted to i:he rear of the property and a�ra}� trom rulton St. The Board determined that there is procedural chan�;es Lhat are needed Uecau^,e of the property line encroachment. 7l�e request lor tl�e :ar- iance is 2�ereUy withdra�vn until L'he proper changes have Ueen made. , There will be no iurthe.• charges made if the appliclnt desires Lo reapply. A hezriug was held on Lhe application oS Birmingham Buil.ders, Inc., 19013 Soundvie�c ilrive, N.W. Stanwood, 14A 98292 for a variance Srom , Sectiion 19.16.030 oi the Everett 67unicipal Code, rfinimum Lot Size, � for permission to construct a dupl.es on 7,200 square feet of land area ratf�er Lha❑ the code requirement oi 7,500 square feet of land area. Legal Description: Lot 10 Block 8, Plat of Lo�ti�ell Approximate Location: 3rd Street & Bigelow (S.E, cor.ier) in Lowell. Zoning: R-2 Single Family IIigh Density Residence h1r. Russell stepped do�vn as cl�airman 1t this Lime and 1�1r. Zoolc then presided. Afr. Gordon Stevenson, a Uuilding contrnctor, represented Birminglium Builders �nd mentioned the proposecl duplex will not be detrimental to the area. There were many of the surrounding neighbors agninst the granting oS the variance tind some of tlieir reasons were as follows: I 1. There are too many multiples in the aren. 2. There �ti�ill be a precedence set if varinnce is granted.