My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3116 TULALIP AVE 2016-01-01 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
TULALIP AVE
>
3116
>
3116 TULALIP AVE 2016-01-01 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/8/2017 7:02:01 AM
Creation date
3/8/2017 7:01:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
TULALIP AVE
Street Number
3116
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
92
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
� � <br /> 2. That such varianee is necessary for the pree:rvation and en�oyment of a� <br /> substantial property right of the appe;lant possessed by the oxners of <br /> other properties in the same vicinity or zone. ' <br /> Finding: Other properties on the same side of the street have <br /> similar lot sizes and front setbacks, however, the properties on the <br /> other side of the street range from �,000 sq. ft. to 10,500 sq. ft. and <br /> 7,000 sq. ft. is the minimum allowed in the zone. <br /> Conclusion: Other propert:es in the same vicinity and zone could build <br /> much larger homes and not =xceed the gross floor area ratio. <br /> 3• That the authorization of such variance will not be materially <br /> detrimental to the public Kelfare or in�urious to property in the <br /> vicinity or zone in xhich the property is located. <br /> Finding: The existing structure was built in 1907 and has been <br /> vacant for five years. The foundation is crumbling, the fireplace and <br /> chimney are unsafe and there has been excavation in the rear yard, <br /> evidently an attempt to fix the foundation, that is a nazard. <br /> Conclusion: The new structure would be an enhancement to the <br /> neighborhood instead of a vacant eyesore that is an attractive nuisance <br /> to transients or cl�ildren. Mr. and Mrs. Howe pla�t on making this their <br /> home along with their two children. <br /> 4. That the granting of such variance will not adversely affect the <br /> Comprehensive Ger,eral Plan. <br /> Finding: The comprehensive plan desi�ation for the area is single <br /> family. <br /> Conclusion: The use is in conformance with the comprel�ensive plan and <br /> so Would not aversely affect it. <br /> NOW� THI':tEFOREt the Board of Ad,justment of the City of Everett does <br /> ' hereby order tl�at the variance of .60 gross floor area ratio from .30 gross <br /> floor area ratio be GRANTED and further require the applicant to meet the <br /> folloxing conditions. <br /> t. Obtain all necessary demolition, Building and Public Works permits. <br /> � <br /> The action of the Hoard of Ad,justment in GRANTING a varianee sha11 be <br /> final and conclusive, unless within fifteen (15) days from the date of <br /> issuance and signing of this order by the Chairman of the Board, an aggrieved <br /> person or persons obtains a writ of certiorari from the Superior Court of <br /> Washington for Snohomish County for the purpose of review of the 3etion taken. <br /> DATED this 8th day of April, 1986. <br /> � <br /> J`�s-- �� �c-n c� <br /> Chairman, Board of Ad,justment <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.