3116 TULALIP AVE 2016-01-01 MF Import

'i � , . n -� I 2. That such variance is necessary for the preservation and en�oyment of a substantial property right of t'.ie appellant possessed by the owners oF other properties in the same vicinity or zone. Finding: Other properties on the same side of the street have similar lot sizes and front setbacks, however� the properties on the other side uf the street range from 7,000 sq, ft. to 10,500 sq. i't. and 7,000 sq. ft. is the minimum allowed in the zone. Conelusion: Other properties in the same vicinity and zone could build much larger homes and not exceed the gross floor area ratio. 3• That the authorization of such variance will not be maT.erially detrimental to the public Welfare or in,jurious to property in the vicinity or zone in which the property is located. Findlne: The existing structure was built in 1907 and has been vacant for five years. The foundation is erumbling, the fireplace , and chimney are unsafe and there has been excavation in the rear ' yard, evidently an attempt to fix the foundation� that is a hazard. Conclusion: The new structure would be an enhancement to the neighborhood instead o° a vacant eyesore that is an attractive , nuisance to transients or children. Mr. and Mrs. Howe plan on making this their home along with their tMo children. 4. That the granting of such variance will not adversely affect the Comprehensive General Plan. Findln3: The comprehensive plan designation for the area is single family. Conclusion: The use is ?n confor'mance with the comprehensive plan and so xould not aversely affect it. RECOt�NfENDATION: APPROVE I APPROVE tl�e variunae as requesLed by applicant with the following conditions. 1. Obtain all necessary demolition, building and public xorks permits. � Prepared by �+ �'� Approved by �ii . u-�� !��/ t'G Li"' �I I � I _p_ 1920G i �