Laserfiche WebLink
II r �a I <br /> � BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT <br /> � FINDINGS� CONCLUSIONS AND ORDER <br /> (Uariance 118-86) ' <br /> Based upon the written request for a varianee from thr. City's zoning , <br /> � code, :,pecifically E.M.C. 19.12.050(A) Front Yards, made by Dale A. Bigge, <br /> i <br /> 10901 29th Dr. S.E., Everett, WA 98204� heri.nafter referred te as <br /> I "Applicant"� regarding property located at 3521 Upland Ave.� the Board of <br /> 'I Ad�ustment, folloNing a public hearing on said application held on M� 5, <br /> II <br /> 1986, and further having reviewed all testimony, makes the following <br /> I Findings, Conclusions� and Order: <br /> 'I <br /> �� I <br /> � <br /> I <br /> I�I FIPiDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: <br /> ' 1. That there have been exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or , <br /> conditions applying to the sub�ect property or as to the intended use <br /> thereof that do not apply generally to other properties Lt the same � <br /> vicinity or zone. <br /> Finding: The property slopes down to the rear of the lot to the I, <br /> � norCh and there is a city installed drain approximately 30 feet south �� <br /> of the rear lot line. ':he varianee r+ill allou the rear of the house I <br /> to be approximately 30 feet from the drain instead of 15 feet which I <br /> li will help preserve the drainage system. I <br /> � I <br /> i Conclusion: If the lot Nas level and tliere was no drainago system on <br /> the lot� the �ariance would not be necessary. �, <br /> i <br /> ,� 2. That sueh variance is necessary for the preservation and en�oyment of , <br /> I a substantial property ri�:ht of the appellant possessed by the owners I <br /> � of other properties in tne same vicinity or zone. <br /> lil Finding: There are several other houses on Upland Avenue that appear . <br /> i to be less than 55 feet from the esnterline. i � <br /> il� Conclusion: The varianee woUld allow a property right en�oyed by <br /> il other owners in the same vicinity and zone. <br /> �� 3• That the authorization oF sueh variance will not be materially ,I <br /> detrimental to the public welfare or in,jurious �o property in the � <br /> vicinity or zone in which the property is located. <br /> Finding: The request for front yard variance would not appear to ', <br /> effect other property in the vicinity. Public Works� Fire and Police ! <br /> Departments had no comments on this varianee request. <br /> Conclusion: This variar.ce will not be in3urious to other properties <br /> in this vicinity and zone. ' <br /> � <br />