3620 UPLAND AVE 2018-01-02 MF Import

I i I I BOARD OF ADJUSTNENT FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND ORDER (Variance 029-84) I 6ased upon the written request for a variance from the City's zoning j code, apec_£ically 18.44 L 19.12.030, made by David Branvold at 3620 Upland 'i Dri�•e, hereinafter _ erred to as "Applicant," the Board of Ad�uetment, ,l folloving a public hearing oc aid application held on October 1, 1984, and further having reviewed all tes[imony, makes �he following Fir.dings, Conclusions, and Order: FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: I � 1. That there have been exceptional or extraordinary circumstances orll conditions applying to the subject proper[y or as to the intended usei thereof tha[ do not apply generally to other properties in the same , vicinity or zone. a. Finding: The applicant oians a P8rce1 of property which is , located a[ 3620 Upland Ave. The applicant's property consists ofl a 148 foo[ by 358 foot lo[ witl� a single family residence. The ' proposed shor[ aubdivision has two lota fronting on the etreet , witli the third lot using tlie proposed 20 foot easement. b. Conclusion: The applicant's property does contain enough land , i areu for three lots (1.29 acre). i : I 2. The authorization of the variance will not be detrimental to the public ', welfare or in�urious to the property in the same vicinity or zone. I a. Finding• The proposed lots are 12,500 square feet, 14,752 square � feet and 25,951 square feet. i� b. Conclusion: The proposed lots have no effect on the public or �i � property in the area. f� 3. There are no reasonable alternalives which would allow for accepta6le I deaign of the short subdivision in accordance with existing standards. , a. Finding: There are no alternatives to a three (3) lot shor[ plat. b. Conclusion: The proposed design allows the most frontage , possible for a two or chree-lot shor[ plat. i 4. The applicant's request for a shor.t subdivision has been processed byj the City who confirms that [he final approval cannot be granted withouti an a�thorized variation from the Board. ' u. Finding: The applicant has not filed a short subdivison with the ��i City. I b. Conclusion: This condition cannot he met until the applicant hael filed a short subdivision with the City.