7627 UPPER RIDGE RD 2016-01-01 MF Import

16 12. Testimony was received from a member of the public questioning the need for sidewalks on 76th Street. The City responded that it is not the Applicant's responsibility to develop the sidewaiks on 76th Street but that improvement would be required on Upper Ridge Road. (Taft testirr.ony, Tyler testimony) Jurisdktion: The Hearing Examiner of the City of Everett has junsdicfional authority to hold a heanng and to issue the decision. That authonty is set forth in EMC 2.23.020. Based on the above findings, the Heanng Examiner enters the lollowing conclusions: CONCLUSIONS 1. On September 13, 1995, the City of Everett approved a Resolution of Intent to Rezone and a Performance Agreement for the develop�ant of a PRD on property located at 7627 Upper Ridge Road, Everett, Washington. The approval allowed construction of 13 new single-family dwellings for elderly low income and disabled•persons. In 1996, the Applicant requested revisions to the approved site plan. The revisions included a change in house sryles, setbacks, traffic circulation, and open space. Subsequent to a public hearing, the amended site plan was issued on August 7, 1996. (Finding 1) 2. In order for a F'RD to he approved or amended, the criteria of EM11C 19.32.030 must be satisfied. Those criteria are satisfied by the proposal. (Findings 5, 7, 10) 3. The amendeo PRD will be located to provide dired access to the project and not create unacceptable volumes o� tra�c on local streets in the neighborhood. With the payment of tha mitigation fee of$4,480, adverse traffic impacts resulting from the proposed development will be eliminated. (Finding 6) 4. The density inu'ease of one unit is within the standards as allowed by the R-1 zoning designation within the City of Everett and the Single- Family Detached, Five to Ten Dwelling Units Per Gross Aue desigrration of the Everett Comprehensive Plan. (Finding 2) 5. The Applicar�t will provide parking that satisfies City of Everett standards. (Finding 9) 5 62