613 VERALENE WAY SW 2016-01-01 MF Import

b. Conclusions: The City provided written notice to all properry owners within 300 feet of the subject site. A letter in suppon of the variance request was submitted by the property owner at 615 Veralene Way and is attached as Exhibit�/4 (Cooper L,etter). The Boazd of Adjustment has jurisdiction to allow deviations from the driveway width upon the private property and finds that the requested variance would not �e deuimental to the subject property or to other properties in the area of the subject property. Criterion No. 3: hat thI e var�ance will only grant the subject properry the same general rights enjoyed by other property in the same area and zone as the subject properry. a. Findin : The applicant states that they should be able to en�oy the same righu as the other 24 homeowners in the neighborhood. The exua driveway was added to get their vehicles off the street so that they v�ould not negatively impact their neighbors. The subject properry is located within the Plat of Veralene Estates. The subject lot and all lots throughout this plat were constructed with "rolled curbs" resulting in other lots within this plat constructing private driveways wider than 20 feet. b. Conclusions: There are many propenies within the Plat of eral�ene .�tates that have driveway widths in excess of 20 feet as requested by the applicant. Criterion No. 4: hat th�nce is the minimum necessary to allow the subject property the general rights described in Criterion 3. a. Findings: See Criteria N3. b. Conclusions: See Criteria//3 Criterion No. 5: he gr'I—' anun�-the vaziance is consistent with the goals and policies of the Everett General Plan. a. Findin�s: The Everett General Plan designates this property as 1.2 Smgle Family Detached. b. Conclusions: The proposed use of the subject property is or residenual purposes and is consistent with the Everett General Plan. There are no specific policies in the Plan that relate to driveways within residential zones.