4712 W VIEW DR 2018-01-02 MF Import

2. That Such variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the appellant possessed by the owners of other properties in the same vicinity or zone. Finding: Other property owners in the neighborhood whose homes are not so close to the property line and square on the lot could extend garages and carports to double garages if they so choose. Conclusion: The appellant wishes to create a double car garage which is an option available to other property owners in the neighborhood. 3. That the authorization of such variance will not be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property in the vicinity or zone in which the property is located. z 0 Granting the variance would still leave more than 25 feet .~- L'__ :n the garage wall and the house to the south. Should the m n-ighbor to the south extend 12 feet to make a double garage, the two structures wouli still be 13 feet apart. -� TI Conclusion: There would =':ill be adequate separation from the adjacent v, m property. co mo '1. That the granting of such variance will not adversely affect the c Ccmprehensive General Plan. O m iz 2 -1 Finding: The Comprehensive Plan designates this area as single family. .o z Conclusion: The use is consistant with the Comprehensive Plan and the c > _ Plan dces not specifically address side yard setbacks. o> RECGMMEND.ITIGN_ nn = m m APPROVE the variance as requested by applicant with the following conditions: o �' or c-) r. 1. Obtain all necessary building Permits to complete the structure. m z � 2. Roof top drainage must be addressed by the use of gutters so as not to m impact the adjacent property. > x D Prepared by Approved by 0 M 1726F 4kl