Laserfiche WebLink
Thomas Noffman Appeal <br />Appeal 9-89 <br />Page -4- <br />16 <br />The Appellant submitted that he has received taz atatemente for 1989 for <br />botF lota. He atated that Snohamiah County conaidere the proper[y aa <br />Cwa lote that can be developed. <br />11. The Appellant submitted that he has decided to build a home on the 3,000 <br />equare foot lot, the subject property. He hae had the property eurveyed <br />and has purchaaed all of the materials in anticipation of the <br />develupment. Horrever, because the lot hae not been certified, he is now <br />precluded from the development of thie lot. <br />12 <br />13. <br />The Appellant sutmit[ed varioua let[era of endoreeuent that have been <br />admitted ae ezhibits in this matter. The vast majorltq of the neighbors <br />in the area support the development of the subject property. <br />Testimony irae received from the public in [hie matter. A eimsary of <br />[heir [estSmony ia ae followa: <br />Michael Hof:man - The witneas aupported the Appellant's requeet for the <br />certlficaiion of the buildable lot. He contended tnat the Appellant is <br />preeerving the neighborhood through quality rork. He su6uitted that [he <br />actions of the Appellant vill upgrade property values in the area. <br />JSn Smith - The witnese submitted that the cooetruction of a houee on <br />the lot vill upgrade the neighborhood. fle su6witted that he supporte <br />the appeal, <br />CONCLUSIONS <br />1. The appeal ie of a City of Everett Planning Department's adoiaistrative <br />denial of a vacant lot north of 2324 ualnut Street, Everett, Waehington, <br />ae being a certifiable lot on which a eingle family dWelling could be <br />built. <br />2. <br />3. <br />4. <br />5. <br />The au4ject property is a aubetandard lot aubject to the provieions of <br />EMC 19, 5.110.B. <br />The two aubstandard lots, including the aubject property and the <br />adjacent property, were acquired by co�on conveyance prior to December <br />1, 1956. <br />Neither of the two lots do meet minimum zoning requiremente and, <br />therefore, have merged and are coneidered to be a eiagle undivided lot. <br />Ttte [xo lote muet be coneidered ae one lot, They cannot be indivldually <br />be ueed, altered, or sold in a manner that diminiehes compliance with <br />lot area and rridih requiremente of R-2 zoned propertiea. <br />DECISION <br />Based upon the preceding findinge of facts and conclueione, the teatimony and <br />evidence suEmitted at the public hearing and upru the impressione of [he <br />Everett H�aring Ezaminer of the site vier, it ia hereby ordered [hat the <br />Everett Planning Department's decision to deny certification of a vacant lot <br />north 2324 Walnut Street, Everett, Washington, ae a buildahle lot ie upheld. <br />