Laserfiche WebLink
��omas Hoffman Appeal <br />Appeal 9-89 <br />Page -5- <br />COMQiENTS <br />The subject property, a 3,000 square foot lot, xae part of the parcel of land <br />that saae included in a deed recorded in Snohomieh County on December 22, 1955 <br />(Sn�homieh County Recording Number 1173641). What this effectively did rae <br />create contiguous lots that were acquired b;� a common conveyance before <br />December 1, 1956. Separately theae tcro lots do not satisfy minimum lot area <br />and width etandarde for the City of Everett. Therefore, the lots must be <br />considered merged. This decision is made pursuant to EMC 19.56.11U.B. <br />The Everett City Council was recently faced srith merger iseuea for lo[e in <br />Everet[ and enacted EMC 19.56.110.B. Such an enactment applied to all lota, <br />including the Appellanta. The City, obviously, vas unaxare of the Appellant's <br />aituation at ehe time of the enactment. <br />It is understood that this creates a aevere hardehip for the Appellant. He <br />obviously has been under the impresaion through taz aseessmente that he had <br />two separate lots. He has saved for the necessary materials to build on the <br />lot and nov after acquiring all of the materials he hae diecovered that he <br />dces not qualify ae a merged lot. <br />Becauee of the inequities in thie caee, it is rpcommended that the Everett <br />Planniag Department meet xith the Appellant for further discueeion to <br />determiae if there ie any other relief that caa be applied to hia case. The <br />Appellant's intentione are noble and would beneflt the estedbthat dtheNEverett <br />they flq in the face of EMC 19.56.110.B. It is sugg <br />Planning Department try to xork out some kind of resolution of this matter for <br />the benefit of the Appellant. <br />Done and dated ehie 30th day of January, 1990. <br />ri�' � �.� — <br />James M. Drlecoll <br />Hearing Fsaminer <br />The decielon on this application has been made by the Hearing Ezaminer based <br />on the authority granted in Ordinance 692-60, ae amended. It is final unleas <br />the folloiring procedure ie followed: <br />1. Any aggrieved party of record �+ho hae actively participated in the <br />hearing before the Ezami¢er may file a�+ritten request with the Eaaminer <br />for reconaideration vithin tea (10) working days of the date of the <br />Ezaminer's deciaion. The Ezaminer's mailing addreae is City Hall, 3002 <br />Wetmore Avenue, Everett, WA, 98201 and the location of the Ezaminer's <br />office ia 2731 Wetmore Building, 3rd floor. The request ahall <br />ezplicitly aet forth alleged errore of procedure, fact or law. The <br />Ezaminer shall act within ten (10) xorking days after the date of the <br />filing oi the r�quest for reconsideration by either denying the request, <br />iaeuing a reviaed decision or calling for an additional public hearing. <br />If. an additional hearing ia required, notice of eaid hearing ehal=ior <br />mailed to all parties of record not less than five (5) wotking day p <br />to the hearing date. The final date for requesting reconaideration ie <br />Febxvary 13, 1990. <br />