Laserfiche WebLink
Thomas Hoffmaa Appeal <br />Appeal 9-89 <br />Page -5- <br />COPII�NTS <br />The aubject property, a 3,000 equare foot lot, was part of the parcel of land <br />that wae included in a deed recorded in Snohomish Countq on December 22, 1455 <br />(Snohamish Countq Recording Number 1173641). What this effectively did waa <br />create contiguous lota that were acquired bq a common conveyance before <br />December 1, 1956. Separately theae two lota do not eatiafy minimum lot area <br />and xidth standarde for the City of Everett. TherefoL:, the lota must be <br />considered merged. Thie decision is made purauant to EMC 19.56.110.B. <br />The Everett City Council wae recently faced rrith merger iesuea for lota in <br />Everett and ecacted F.�(C 19.56.110.B. Such an enactment applied Co all lote, <br />including the Appellanta. The City, obviously, was unaware of the Appellant's <br />aituation at the time of the enactment. <br />It ie underetood that thia creates a severe hardship for the Appellant. He <br />obviously has been uuder the impresaion through taz aseesamente that he had <br />two aeparate lota. He has eaved for the necessary materials to build on the <br />lot and nov after acquiring all of the materials he has diacovered that he <br />dcee not qualify as a merged lot. <br />Becauae of the inequitles in thie caee, it is recommended that the Everett <br />Plaaning Department meet with the Appellant for further dlscueaion to <br />determine if there is any other relief that can be applied to hia case, The <br />Appellant's intentions are noble and vould benefit the neighborhood. However, <br />they fly ia the face of EMC 19.56.110.B. It ie auggested that the Everett <br />Planning Deparffient try to rrork out eome kind of resolution of this matter for <br />the benefit of the Appellant. <br />Done and dated thie 30th day of Jaauary, 1990. <br />� �� �� <br />James M. Driecoll <br />Heariag Ezaminer <br />The decieion on this application hae been made by the Hearing Ezaminer based <br />on the authority granted in Ordinance 692-80, as amended. It ie final unlesa <br />[he follosdng procedure ie followed: <br />1• Any aggrieved party of record who hae actively participated in the <br />hearing before the Ezaminer may file a written request with the Ezaminer <br />for reconsideration within ten (10) irorlcing days of the date of the <br />Ezaminer's deciaion. The Ezaminer's mailing addrese is City Hall, 3002 <br />Wetmore Avenue, Everett, WA, 98201 and the location of the Ezaminer's <br />office ia 2731 Wetmore Building, 3rd floor. The requeat ehall <br />ezplicitly set forth alleged errors of procedure, fact or law. The <br />Ezaminer ehall act wi.thin ten (10) working days after the date of the <br />filiag of the request for reconsideratioa by either deaying the request, <br />isauing a reviaed deciaion or calling for an additional public hearing. <br />If an additlonal hearing ie required, notice of said hearing ehall be <br />mailed to ail partiea of record not lesa than five (5) rrorking day prior <br />to the hearing date. The final date for requeating reconaideration ia <br />Febniary 13, 1990. <br />