1132 RUCKER AVE 2018-01-02 MF Import

� � ��, �� D 15 l tti�� '"' '�1 SEp �b 19°0 _...... I30ARD OF ADJUSTNENT _.--"`GVERL��NUINGS CONCLUSIONS AND ORDER VARIANCE NO. 23-90 ......�1SY �F �ks D�P�' I pub�ic`No Based upon the written request for a variance from the City's zoning code by: Applicant: Lloyd Bath 1132 Rucker Avenue Everett, WA 98201 hereinafter referred to as "Applicant," for a variance from Section 39.150.C.2, to allow a deck to be built higher than 36" in the ten foot side setback on the property commonly known as: 1132 Rucker Avenue. The Doard of Adjustment, following a public hearing on said application held on September lo, 1990 and further havinq re- viewed all testimony, makes the following Fin.iings, Con- clusions and Order: FI�?NGS !�*!D CONGL�t�rONS: Criterion No. 1• That the variance is necessary because of exceptional or ex- traordinary circumstances regarding the size, shape, topography, or location of the subject property; or the location of a pre-existing improvement on the subject property that conformed to the zoning code in effect when the improvement was constructed. a. Fi��+�� The existing house and garage do not meet the ten foot required setback from the side property line along 12th Street. The proposed deck will not extend any claser to the side property line than the existinq house or garage. To gain access from the proposed deck to the dininq room, the deck needs to be built along the south portion of the house. For the deck to be level with the floor of the dining room, the deck must exceed the 36" height limit. b. �^*+��+��*+A� There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances reqarding the location of a pre-existing improvement on the subject property that conformed to the zoning code in effect when the improvement was constructed. �iterion No. 2• That the variance will not b� materially detrimental to the property in the area of the subject property or to the City as a whole. a. Findina�: No adverse comments have been received at this time. b, Cpvclt�cinnc: The variance should not be materially detrimental to the property in the area of the subject property or to the City as a whole. ^riterion No. 3� That the variance will only grant the subject property the same general rights et�joyed by other property in the sa.me area and zone as the subject oroperty. a. Ei ��.+gs: It appears that the majority of the houses within the same area have a deck or other structures to the rear and or sides of the house. One might be able to assume that a majority of the decks enter off the dining room. If the variance is not obtained for the tr---_ .:Il .A��..� .�ii ...ic uiilii�y ��i�i� �iicii ��llj` u�i.l3iiG6 wi�liiu