1501 RUCKER AVE 2018-01-02 MF Import

. �- � FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: Criterion No. 1: That the variance is necessary because of cxceptional or extraordinary circumstances regarding the size, shape, topography, or location of the subject property; or the location of a pre-existing improvement on the subiect property that conformed to the zoning code in effect when ihe improvement was constructed. a. Findin s: The subject parcel has exceptional or extraurdinary circumstances based upon the following; a) it is a narrow lot only 25 feet in width with a total area of only 3,100 sq.ft.; b) it was developed in the early 1900's prior to any zoning code regulations. b. Conclusions: The subject property has exceptional circumstances because it is a narrow substandarci lot that was created prior to zoning code requirements. It is very limited in lot widtli dimensions as well as overa�l lot area. Criterion No. 2: That the variance will not be materially detrimental to the property in the area of the subject property or to the City as a whole. a. Findin s:. The applicant states that the proposal is to replace an old rotten garage that was over the property line with a new wood frame garage that has siding and roofing similaz to the house. The garage has been reviewed for consistency with the character of the neighborh.,od area and lias been approved by the Historic Commission. The City provided wrilten notice to all property owners within ?OG feet of the subject property and no comments were received. Conclusions: The proposed variance will not be materially detrimental to the neighborhood area or the City as a whole. 2