My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1617 RUCKER AVE 2016-01-01 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
RUCKER AVE
>
1617
>
1617 RUCKER AVE 2016-01-01 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/8/2017 6:56:52 PM
Creation date
3/8/2017 6:56:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
RUCKER AVE
Street Number
1617
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
82
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i � <br /> ; <br /> . . ! <br /> � <br /> Crit�rioe No. 2• <br /> ' That such variance is necessary for the preservation and en- �, <br /> : joyment of a substantial property riqht of the appellant pos ! <br /> ,sessed by the owners of other properties in the same vicinity or ' <br /> ;zone. <br /> Ia. Findina: There are many cther properties in the north � <br /> � end that exceed the lo percent coverage for accessory i <br /> buildings. These would be nonconforming since they were <br /> � in existence prior to the curzent code. The Board <br /> ' qranted a much qreater variance for accessory lot <br /> � coveraqe to Vince Mardesich in this same block on Rucker. <br /> I That variance was fcr a 54$ increase over what the code <br /> I allowe. Tha applicant is requestinq a 78 incrense over <br /> Iwhat the code allows. I <br /> j b. Conclusion: Grantinq this variance would allow the i <br /> � applicant a property right enjoyed by others in this , <br /> � vicinity and zone. I <br /> iCrit.rion Ilo. 3• I <br /> �That the authorization of such variance will not be saterially � <br /> Idetrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property in the ' <br /> �vicinity or zone in which the property is located. <br /> � a. Findina: The proposed qaraqe would be in the rear yard <br /> I aree with accass froa the alley. All other code <br /> requiremants will be met and there are no views that will <br /> ' be blxked by the qaraqa. In this blxk, moat of the <br /> I reer yards abuttinq the alley are either fanced to a <br /> height of six feat or hava accessory buildinqs <br /> i conatructed on tha raer property line so you cannot even <br /> � see into most of tha yards off the alley in this block. <br /> i <br /> b. Conclusion: Granting this varianca would not be <br /> detriaental to the public welfare or injurious to other <br /> prop�rty in trie vicinity and zone and would improve the <br /> prap�=ty which would be a benefit to the entire <br /> n�iqhborhood. <br /> That rhe granting of such variance will not adversely affect the <br /> Compr��hensive General Plan. <br /> i a. Findina: The comprehensive plan desiqnation is sinqle <br /> ', family rasidential. <br /> � b. Conclusion: Grantinq this variance will not adversely <br /> ' affect the Comprehensive Plan. <br /> NOW, THEREFORE, the ffoard of l�djustment of the City of Everett <br /> }ioes heraby order that the variance as requested by the Applicant <br /> be GR�WTED and further require the applicant to meet the followinq <br /> conditions. <br /> �. Obtain all nacessary buildinq permits and comply with all <br /> other code requirements including but not limited to a five <br /> foot side setback and height limit of fifteen feet. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.