Laserfiche WebLink
December 4, 1985 <br />Sheila Brashear <br />3007 - 91st S.E. <br />Everett, WA 98204 <br />Re: Application for Home Occupation Permit <br />and Business License for business named <br />"Charge' de'affaires" at 3424 Runk,3r i5 in Everett, NA <br />Dear Ms. Brashear: <br />CITY OF <br />everett <br />CITY HALL . 259P255 <br />E VERETT. WASHNOTON <br />G"201 <br />After reviewing your application for a home occupation permit, the City has <br />determined that you do not meet the general requirements of the Everett Municipal <br />Code (E.M.C.) Chapter 19.1'4 (copy enclosed) to qualify as a home occupation and so <br />hereby denies your request for a home occupation permit. <br />Since no one is living in Apartment ♦5 and the entire apartment unit is to be used <br />for the occupation, the following general requirements of S.M.C. 19.44.02 are not <br />met. <br />D. No person other than the occupant of the dwelling shall be employed on the <br />premises. <br />E. No more than one -quarter of the total floor area of the dwelling shall be <br />used for the occupation. <br />In regard to whether your use would be permitted as a "professional office" in the <br />R-4 zone, the following is provided: <br />What constitutes a "professional office" is not clearly <br />defined in the City code. City policy has been to use <br />the common everyday usage and meaning of the term <br />"professional office" as one that engages in any <br />occupation or vocation that is not purely commercial, <br />mechanical or agricultural in which a professed knowledge <br />of science or learning is used, and which is <br />professionally licensed; such as a doctors, lawyers, or <br />architect's office. <br />1708F <br />