3805 RUCKER AVE 2018-01-02 MF Import

Criterion No. 4• That the variance is the minimum necessary to allow the subject property the general rights deE _ribed in Criterion 3. a. Fin in s: See Criteria #3. b. Conclusions: See Criteria #3 Criterion No. 5• The granting of the variance is consistent with the goals and policies of the Everett General Plan. A. Findings: The Everett General Plan designates this property as 4.4, Mixed Use Commercial. b. Conclusions: The granting of the variance is consistent with the goals and policies of the Everett General Plan. Criterion No. 6: The need for the requested variance is not the result of a self-created hardship. a, Fintijpn: The applicant has stated that the variance is necessary because of changing customer needs. When the restaurant was built, drive -through restaurants did not exist. The drive -through restaurant is needed to provide increased convenience to their customers. b. Conclusions: The need for the requested variance is not a self created hardship. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Adjustment of the City of Everett does hereby order that a variance be GRANTED to allow for a portion of the vehicle holding lane to be within 35 feet of the residentially zoned property east of the subject property subject to the following condition: 1. Provide a five foot high, sight obscuring fence along the alley. The action of the Board of Adjustment in GRANTING a variance shall be final and conclusive, unless withi. thirty (30) days from the date of issuance and signing of this order by the Chairman of the Board, an aggrieved person or persons obtains a writ of certiorari from the Superior court of Washington for Snohomish County for the purpose of review of the action taken. DATED this 9th day of January, 1995. rA I I 9d lof Adjustment