3805 RUCKER AVE 2018-01-02 MF Import

a. F' in • A restaurant exists on the site. The applicant wishes to modernize the restaurant by reconstructing the restaurant and adding a drive-thru. The property does not have enough ,:epth to provide the required setback for the eight space holding lane from the residential zone. b. Conclusions: The location and size of the property prohibits the ability to provide the 100 foot seperation between the holding lane and residential zoned property. Criterion No. 2: That the variance will not be materially detrimental to the property in the area of the subject property or to the City as a whole. a. Findings: The applicant has stated that the vehicle holding lane will be screened from the residential property to the east by a 5' high solid wood fence. This should reduce light and noise impacts to the adjacent property. b. Conclusions: The variance should not be materially detrimental to surrounding properties. Criterion No. 3• That the variance will only grant the subject property the same general rights enjoyed by other property in the same area and zone as the subject property. A. Findings: The subject property is located in a zoning district that allows for restaurant/fast food "use" with drive-thru capability. b. Conclusions: A drive-thru restaurant is permittad on the subject property. There are a number of existing drive-thru restaurants in the area which were established prior to the current zoning code, a number of which do not meet current zor'ng code requirements as related to drive-thru restaurants.