Laserfiche WebLink
�iarch 4 , 1979 (cont' d) <br /> � � _ � <br /> .,�,� IAfter viewing the subject property and considering all the facts <br /> and testimony, it was moved by Mr. IIerg, seconded by I�ir. Ingram <br /> and unanimously carried to grant the applicant' s request for the <br /> followir.g reasons : <br /> 1 - The granting of t11e variance is necessary for the appli- <br /> cant' s enjoyment of his property rights. <br /> i 2 - Granting the variance will not be detrimental to the <br /> surrounding area. <br /> 3 - Thare are excepticnal circumstances which apply to the <br /> subject property that do not apply generally to other <br /> properties in the vicinity. <br /> 4 - Granting the variance will not be injurious to the General <br /> Compreliensive Plan. <br /> A hearing was held on the application of Herb Norgaard, 912 Center <br /> Place, Everett for a variance from Sec. 15.04 .050 E.C.C. (Zoning <br /> Code) General Provisions - Land Use for permission to divide a ' <br /> tract into two (2) parcels that will not abut for a minimum of <br /> 40 feet on a public dedicated street. ALSO: For a var� ance from <br /> Sec. 15.04 . 075 �.C.C. (Zoniny Code) R-S, Suburban Residential <br /> � Zone for permission to divide the aforementioned lot into two (2) <br /> � parcels of land containing 10,605 sq. ft. Existing zoniny pro- <br /> visions reqi�ire that said parcels abut for a minimum of 90 ft. <br /> on a public dedicated street and have a minimum of 12,500 sq. ft. <br /> of land area. R-S SuUurban Residential Zone. Lot 7 and Lot 8 less N 70ft., <br /> Block 4 , Shore Acres Addition. 5029 Sound Avenue (approximately) . <br /> Mr. Norgaard added that throo,h the advice of his engineer, he <br /> would use Alki Drive , which is iocated on the N.E, corner af Lot 7 , <br /> as a private driveway. So Alki Drive would become a gravelled <br /> private driveway from its oriyination to Lot 7. The access to <br /> the other two parcels of property would be from Sound Avenue. <br /> A number of the neighbors were against Mr. horgaard' s request <br /> for the following reasons : <br /> 1 - There would be too many small divisions of the property, <br /> which is cont-rary to the continuity of the area. <br /> 2 - There is some question as to the road usage, particularly <br /> on the private roadway. <br /> 3 - Drainage and v:ater is a prcblen now; this Y:ould increase <br /> , the proble�r. <br /> r, <br /> _,_ <br />