6920 SEAWAY BLVD 2018-01-01 MF Import

Env. Doc. - Fluke Page -3- FINDINGS: 1. A detailed Environmental Icpact Sta[emen[ was prepared foc the Southvesi Everett Plan (Final EIS, Nov. 1981) and the plan was adopted in April 1982• The S.W. Everett Plan identifies [he propoaed site as "Planned Industrial Dletrict" (PID) . In the PID area, "campue like facilities" for manufacture of electronics are suggested as uaes to b�. permitted outtight. The proposed John Fluke Master Plan development and individual phases of the plan are in general compliance vith the land use designations af the Southvest Everett Comprelienaive Plan. 2. The proposed site is currently zoned M-1, Heavy Manufacturing, vhich would permit the proposed use. 3. Master Plan Development Proposal: The Mas[er Plan includes four phasea of development with construction to occur during the next 10-15 years. The Phase I building has previously been constructed (SBPA �178-36) . The yaster Plan includes a total of 1 ,540,000 aq. ft. of building area for office and electronic research, engineering, and product asaembly uses on an approximately 150 acre site. The Plan includes associated parking and an internal traffic and pedestrian circulation system, open-space areas, and nature jogging trail. A. Employment - At the completion of Master Plan development, Che site vould house approximately 4,000 employees. Secondary employment of 8,000 could be generated. The total employmen[ generated (12,000) falls vithin the employment range anticipated in the S.W. Everett Plan, but is less intensive than the worst case impact projections con[ained in [he S.W. Everett Plan and EIS. B. Population - The primary employees would generate a population �f approximately 9,200 and secondary population generated would be approximately 18,400; total population impacts would be '_'7 ,400 people. These impacts are lese intensive than population projections for this PID area con[ained in the S.W. Everett Plan and EIS. C. Housing - Master Plan development would generate a need for approximately 4,000 housing units for primary employees, and 8,00� units for secondary employment. The total 12,000 housing units required are less than those projected in the S.W. Evere[t EIS for [his PID area. D. Schools - Regional student populations generated by the primary and secondary employees could range� from 2,520 students to 8,400 s[udents, dis[ributed among all school grades. The impacts are Less in:ensive than projections contained in [he S.W. Everett Plan und EIS. �