3202 WETMORE AVE 2018-01-02 MF Import

The mid -block owner must adhere to the front set back, but has a lesser set back on the side. The real extraordinary circumstance he rden ris tht atherathanhcityrner withlot theirner unusedr80tfooturightwofhhis 10 feet way. Enjoyment of a substantial property right Application of the set back requirement on Wetmore and 32nd. deprives the owner of 2200 square feet out of a total of 12,000 square feet. If no new building were built, and he•thewoexistinuld bea building left in place, left alone, or remodeled, tre building in the same location as the new building, should I be allowed this variance. Thus I am deprived of the use of 2200 feet by improving the property. There is a real benefit to the other property owners who have not built new buildings: they can continue to use the property which the City requires for a set back for new construction. They possess this right; the variance is needed for me to have this right preserved. GRANTING OF THE VARIANCE WILL NOT BE DETRIMENTAL The existing building sits on she property line, it is not deterimental to the welfare or injurious to other properties in the neighborhood. There is no disruption of site lines for autos going East on A d. Conversely, granting of the variance will be bene'icial to other, property owners in the neighborhood. Across the street there is a 50 foot lot in a prime locations virtually rendered unbuilddaable because of the set back requirements. i ha�alked to qe� does not ink eayN,ua of '9 corner lots in the immediate vicinity to the neighborhood. reduction of the setback would be A w� All EFFECT ON THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The staff of the City's Planning Department advises me that there would be no effect on the comprehensive general p lan ifthis variance were allowed. The comprehensive plan does not call for the use of the unused portion of the City's 80 foot right-of-way; thus this will still be available to provide in fact set backs on both Wetmore and 32nd. Applicant Signature Date: April 6, 1988