Laserfiche WebLink
n< L.COO�CR <br />1[�l�E n. [001�[n <br />cor+n�o �. �.�caso�+ <br />C O O P E R & C O O P E R <br />n�roaH�vs <br />�oi-aoz ecn�rr ri�i�on�c. <br />wr_n�r�, wnsnir�c.�ora aezoi <br />r.t �,.�F y-�isv, <br />Junc 28, 1967 <br />Frank IIennett� Pl�unin� Director <br />City of Everett <br />City llall <br />1!vcrett� Washington <br />i)ear tlr. Bemiett: l:e: I,etropolitan Construction Compa-�y, <br />Applicant: Apartment at 3221 We[more <br />At your request I have reviewed the application of the above applicant <br />for a buildin� permit [o construcl' an apartment house on the above <br />prer.�ises. <br />It appears .`rom my investigation that the original application� iuclud- <br />ing plans and specifications� was approved by �11 Departments� except <br />Che TrafLic Engineer. The Traffic Engineer evidently expressed disapprocal <br />of the str�et .evel provision for parkin� and indicated that if certain <br />support beams were moved� the applicant could conply with ltis off-strn�t <br />�-::z;cing requirement. <br />Thereafter� and withouC fu*ther consulting with the Buildi�.g DeparCment� <br />the Applicant evidently changed the structural location of certain be�ms. <br />TI;Ls change •.esulted in a violation of the 'Loning Code and was made with- <br />out apprising the Building Officials� and in particular the IIuiidinF In- <br />spector. The Buildins Inspector had not approved such change� nor was he <br />�iven an opportunity by th� Applicant to expreas his apprwal. If he had� <br />the obvious violation of the �onin�; Code change would have resulted in <br />his disapproval of the chanp,c in plans. Tltereafter� the applicant evi- <br />den[ly proceeded and a atop-work order was contemplated. <br />You are advised that the sole authority for approval and issuance of Che <br />6uildink permits is vested in Chc Buildin� Inspector of the City of <br />EvcretC. <br />-1- <br />