3330 WETMORE AVE 2016-01-01 MF Import

::enneth Mayer Appeal Appeal 7-90 Page -3- CONCLUSIONS 1. The Appellant requested a Use Peimit for proper[y at 3330 Wetmore Avenue, Everett, W�shington. The Use Permit was requested on June 7, 1990. The Citq of Everett refuaed to process the requeat because the proposed office wae not a permitted use ia the R-4 zone in which the property La located. �n appeal of this refueal aae filed by the Appellant. 2. The request of the Appellant is governed by the provisions of the Everett Zoning Code effective January 13, 1990. 3. The propoaed office use is not a permitted uae ia an R-4 cone in the City of Everett. 4. The Appellant xas not vested for the development of aa office use pursuant to [he provisions of the Everett Zoning Code, Section 44.5 et seq. 5. The propoaed project must be developed pursuant to the zoning regulatione of the January 13, 1990, Everett Zoniag Code. The Appellant ia not allowed to have hia application reviexed and the proposed project developed under the zoning regulation procedures that existed prior to January 13, 1990. The Appellant doea not have a veeted right for the proposed office uae in ehe R-4 zone. 6. There wae no completed Huilding Permit Application nor other laad use approval to xarrant veating of the Appellant. 7. Adequate public notice was given of the zoning change and the adaption of the new Zoning Code. The public, including the Appellant, xere put on notice of the zoning change and the a1loWed usea in the R-4 zone. 8. The City of Everett Utility Servicea Department's actions do not constitute a vesting of developmental righta for the Appellant. The City of Everett Planning Department and the land use review proceas muet be adhered to in order for vesting to occur. DECISION Based upon the preceding findings of facts and conclusions of law, the testimony and evidence suYmitted at the public hearing, and upon the impresaiona of the Everett Hearing Esaminer, the City of Everett administrative decision refusing to process a Uae Pecmit Application for converaion of a aingle-family reaidence to an office uae at 3330 Wetmore Avenue, Everett, Washington, is upheld.