Laserfiche WebLink
. � i <br /> ... � �� <br /> � <br /> STAFF RfiPORT TO BOARD OF �D�TUSTMfiNT ; <br /> V11RI]WCB / 16-88 <br /> DATE: June 6, 1988 <br /> applicant: Rodney Heppell '' <br /> 3523 Shore Ave. <br /> Everett � <br /> Location of Property: 3523 Shore Ave. � I <br /> Variance Requested: From E.M.C. 19.12.050 (B) , Sideyards, tol <br /> allow an addition to an existinq <br /> nonconforming garage that has a fourteen I <br /> inch east side setback instead of the seven <br /> and one-half foot setback required by code. <br /> The fourteen inch east side setback would <br /> be extended for twelve and one-half feet t�� <br /> the south alonq the east property line from <br /> the existing non-conforming garage. <br /> Bxisting Zoninq: R-S, Sinqle Family Suburban Residential <br /> Sxisting Land Use: Single family structure with garage) <br /> connected by breezeway to house. ; <br /> Adjacent Land Use/Zoninq: North: k-S/Port Gardner Bay <br /> South: R-S/Sinqle Family <br /> East: R-S/Single Family <br /> West: R-S/Single Family I <br /> �xltibits: ; <br /> i. Vicinity/7.oning Map <br /> 2. Site Plan <br /> 3. Narrative Statement <br /> 4. Parcel Map <br /> 5. Elevations of Garage <br /> gTNDINGS !�� CONCLdTST_ONS: <br /> criterion No. 1: <br /> That there hate been exceptional or extraordinary circumstances <br /> or conditions applying to the subject property or as to the in- <br /> tended use thereof that do not apply generally to other <br /> properties in the same vicinity or zone. I <br /> � <br /> a. Findina: The Applicant is proposing a 570 square foot I � <br /> addition to an existing 430 square foot garaqe. The <br /> property is a large, 19,600 square foot lot on a bluff ! <br /> overlooking the bay and the house is situated on the rear <br /> of the lot to take advantage of the view, with the �� <br /> existing garage on the street side of the lot. The <br /> existing garage is nonconforming since it is only <br /> fourteen inches from the east side property line instead <br /> of the seven and one-half feet required by code. The <br /> Applicant wishes to extend the garage twelve and one- �I I <br /> half feet towards the front of the lot and match the <br /> existing nonconforming side of the existing garage. ' ! <br /> I <br /> b. Conclusion: There are unusual circumstances applying to � <br /> this property because of the location of the existing <br /> garage and the fact that it is constructed of brick which <br /> would make it difficult to move to meet setback. <br />