3523 SHORE AVE 2016-01-01 MF Import

CrltCtlOn NO 2' That such variance is necessary for the preservation and en-' joyment of a substantial property right of the appellant pos- sessed by the owners of other properties in the same vicinity or; zone. a. Findina: in the past, variances have been granted to: allow additions to existing nonconforming garages. b. COnr1LS10h: Granting this variance would allow a . property right possessed by others. ' � ��iterion No. 3• �I That the authorization of such variance wili not be materially detrimental to the publ.ic welfare or injurious to property in the� vicinity or zone in whi��h the property is locatea. ; i a. Findina: The original one-story height of the existi�iq �� garage will be maintained, the addition will be constructed t.o match the existing structures with brick � and beveled ::idinq. There will be no view blockage sincel the garage will be south of the single family structure I and there is no opportunity for a view from any angle. in addition, Public Works had no adverse comments and no � adverse comments were received from notification of property owners within 30o feet of the site. �i� i b. conclusion:, Authorization of this variance would not be � detrimental. to the public welfare or injurious to other , property in the vicinity or zone. rri twri o11 NO. 4: That the granting of such variance will not adversely affect the Comprehensive General Plan. � a. Findina: The Comprehensive Plan designation for this area is sinqle family detached and the garage is an accessary use to the single family structure on the site. b. Gonclusion: Granting this variance will not adversely I affect the comprehensive plan. RgCp�p[SliDATION: I� APPROVE the variance as requested by applicant with the following conditions. 1, Obtain all necessary permits. Prepared by Reviewed by � �' -2-