Laserfiche WebLink
, <br /> i <br /> NOTICE OF COMPLE'k'E APPLICATION <br /> P(,ANNED ACTION DETERMINATION <br /> Aod <br /> PROPOSED MITIGATED DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICAN <br /> SEPA#O1-014,Planned Action <br /> Jansport/Sierra Construction Wuehouse <br /> May 24,2001 <br /> DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL: The proposed action is i�suance of building and public <br /> works permits to allow constr�ction of an approximately 200,000 square foot warehouse building <br /> for Jansport. The proposed building requires a 4,000 gallon p�r minute fire tlow. <br /> PROPONENT: Spencer Mayes/Sierra Construction <br /> . 16715 NE 79th St. D IL r, � � � n � <br /> Redmond, WA 9805? L, lVi \�/ D <br /> PROPONENT'S MAY 2 4 2001 <br /> REFRESENTATI�'E: Same as above <br /> CITY OF EVERETT <br /> LOCATION: SE- Comer of Hardeson Road and Shuksan Way Permit Services <br /> ZONING: M-1, Office & Industrial Pazk�vith a Planned Development Overlay <br /> GENEFLIL PLAN: 5.4, Office and Industrial Pazk <br /> Lead Agenc��: Ciry of E��erett Planning Department <br /> Contact Pcrson: Gary Dotighty Phone: (425) 257-8731 <br /> Construction of a Z00,000 square foot warehouse/distribution building is consistent with the City <br /> of Everett South�eest E��erett Subarea Plan Planned Action Ordinance. The 4,000 gallon per <br /> minute (gpm) f re tlow requirement is in excess of the 3,000 gpm fire flow revie�ved in the <br /> South��•est Everett Subarea Plan EIS, and is subject to the standard SEPA review. <br /> The City of Everett Planning and Communitv Development Director has detettnined that: <br /> • The project is located within the boundaries of the Southwest Everett Subarea Plan. <br /> • The zomng designation of the property upon which the project is proposed is consistent with <br /> those designations analyzed in the South���est EveretUPame Field Subazea Plan and EIS, <br /> December 1996. <br /> • The proposed use is consistent with the uses and intensities allowed in the City's <br /> development regulations and is listed as a use analyted in the final EIS, Tables 3.1-I and 3.1- <br /> 2. <br /> • The project is a use that implements the Subazea Plan and the project's significant <br /> environmental impacts have been adequately addressed in the SW �veretUPaine Field <br /> Subarea Plan EIS. <br /> • The project's significant adverse environmental impacts�vill be mitigated through the <br /> application of the mitigation decision document. These mitigation measures, along with <br /> other Ciry requircments and conditions, constitute sufficient miugation for the significant <br /> environmental impacts associated with Qie proposed project. <br /> • The proposed pro�ect must comply with all applicable local, state and federal regulations and <br /> development standards. <br /> ��ZU <br />