Laserfiche WebLink
: i , <br /> � �� <br /> �� <br /> � BOARD OF ADJOSTMENT <br /> � FINDINGS� CONCLUSZONS AND ORDBR � <br /> � i VARIANCE #13-86 � <br /> I 8ased upon the rmitten request for a variance from the City�s zoning �, <br /> i <br /> I code as follorrs: ' <br /> � <br /> ,I I <br /> '� A. Variance from E.M.C. 79•14.040 Groas Floor Area Ratio, to allorr I <br /> � consLruetion of a 2�972 a4• ft. single family residence on an � <br /> � appro�cimately 8,500 sq. ft. lot which would have a gross floor area ' <br /> ratio of .35 instead of the .30 allowed by code. <br /> I <br /> i B. Variance from E.N.C. 19.71.050(1)(B)(2)(a), (b), and (c) Development i <br /> Standards for Permitted Uses in the Flood Fringe Distrlet to allox I <br /> (a) the first £loor of the stivetu:•e to be at or above the regulatory ; <br /> �� flood protection elevation instRad of two feet above ae required by i <br /> � Code; (b) to be at or above the regulatory flood protection elevation <br /> i for a distance of 15 feet beyond any structure instead of two feet I <br /> i above as required by Code; and (3) to match the topography of the i <br /> i three to one fill slope beyond 15 feet from any structure instead of I <br /> the one foot above as required , <br /> , <br /> i i <br /> I made by Virgil and Donna Forney, 2419 lihitechuck Dr.� �erett, HA 98204, � <br /> � hereinafter referred to as "Applicant," regarding property located at I <br /> ; I <br /> i71925 Silver Lake Drive, the Hoard of Ad�ustment, folloxing a public hearing <br /> I on said application helA on June 2� 1986, and further having reviewed all � <br /> I <br /> Itestimony� makes the following Findings� Conclusions� and Order: ; <br /> I <br /> FINDINGS AND CONCLOSIONS: <br /> � <br /> � 1. That there have been exeeptional or extraordinary cireumstances or <br /> conditions applying to Lhe sub�ect property or an to the intended use , <br /> thereof that do not apply generally to other propertie3 in the same ', <br /> vicinity or zone. i <br /> i IA. Finding: City zoning code defines ^Gross Floor Area Ratio" as , <br /> � the sum of all the floors of a building divided by tha lot <br /> �I I area. The City feels a more reasonable way to limit lot � <br /> � coverage xould be to consider the footprint of the building as i <br /> , the basis for figuring gross floor area ratio since there is ' <br /> � already a height limitation that controls the n�ber of <br /> � � floors. In the past, the gross floor area ratio has not been <br /> j uniformly enforced; however, the City feels that rather than ! <br /> ' disregarding the code it is more appropriate to consider <br /> ;� applications for varianee on an individual basis until the <br /> ;i zoning code is changed. <br /> i <br /> In this case the Applicant is proposing a two-story house and , <br /> �� the actual footprint of the structure (1,753 sq. ft.) will <br /> � cover only 27¢ of the 8,550 sq. ft. lot. <br /> :I <br /> � Conclusion: The vaMance as proposed by the Applicant appears <br /> , to be a reasonable request. <br /> ,I <br /> �i <br /> I � <br /> , <br /> il i <br /> I <br /> I � <br />