3711 SMITH AVE 2016-01-01 MF Import

Everett Goapel Misaion SPU 7-90 Page —4— 10. The entire site is depicted on the eite plan admitted as eahibit 3 at the public hearing. 11. The projected peak hour parking demand a[ the center will result in Ciie aeed for approzimately 18 parking epaces. The�ee licantd hasr ro oeed C17 for three donor volunteera and ataff. The App P P on—site parking apaces which, combined with seven (7) on—atreet parking spacea, will provide 24 parking spacea for the staff and public. 12. The General Plan Map of the City of Everett designatea the subject prnperty as Light Industry. Within the General Plan there are no apecific policies for location of eocial aervice facilities, auch as the one proposed by the Applicaat. The General Plan does allow these typea of facilities to be located in the Central Busiaesa District within a certaia area. 13. The proposed project is not sunnunded by any Single Family or Multiple Family Residential Zonea. Most of the area is developed with induatrial uae. Urban services, including traneportatioa services, are available in the i�ediate area. 14. The Everett Planning Department eubmitted that the proposed uae is conaiatent with the Coaprehensive Plan deaignation and ia compatible with the eziating uses. Becauae of the close prozimity of induatry, many of the clients of the Applicant may be a reeource for day labor for the bueinesses. In additlon, the direct bue servicee vill allow the residents of the facility to move to other portione of town for other necesaities, such as jobs, medical treatment, etc. 15. The sub�ec[ property is also zoned to allov adult entertainment uses. There have been no proposals submitted to the Everett Planniag Department for conversion of the aurrounding propertiee to theae uses. The controlled operation of the Applicant will not be impacted by future: adult entertainment usee. 16. Pursuaat to the State Environmental Policy Act, the City of Everett vae deaignated as the lead agency. On April 24, 1990, a Final Determinatioa of Non—Significance waa iesued for the project. The DNS rras iseued after the Applicant hae submitted the Enviroomental Checklist. 17. In Snohomish Couaty in 1989, approzimately 2,883 individuals spent over 46,000 nighte in emergency ahelter programs• Ia 1988, there were over 3,700 individuals who were turned away from euch programs. There is obviously a public need for the facility as proposed by the Applicant and thue this project will serve the public convenience aad receaeity. 18. The Everett Planning Department recommended approval of the propoeal subject to the conditiona as set forth i❑ the ataff report.