3711 SMITH AVE 2016-01-01 MF Import

r'.verett Gospel :1lssion Revlsion to SPU 1-90 Page -3- 3. The original Special Property Use Permit had .i slte plan that depicted �4 parking s[alls. Seventeen of these parking sealls were �r � understructure while seven of [hem uere on either Smith Street or 37th � Street. The revised site plan eliminates the understructure parking and p�x places all 24 parking stalls on surface level. Fourteen of [he parkiag 9H � stalls will be located in [he alley behind the building, snd, the r xy remaining ten stalls will be located on Soith Street and 37th S[reet. HZ� K y � G , The rear yard setback of the original site plan called for a "0" foot O x O setback from the rear yard. The revlsed site plan shows a 30 foot �t~n H setback. The north side yard setback originally had a ten foot/five � y�� ":� foot setback while the revised site plan shows a 15 foot setback. The y south side yard setback originally had a five foot setback while the O H revised site plan has an eigh[een foot, four inch setback. H �g �" n 5. The original site plan provided a loading xone off of Smith S[reee. The ay� revlsed site pla❑ indicates that the loading zone will 6e off 37th r y Street. �yNH p N H 6. The original slte plan depicted landscaping on Smith Street and 37th n d y Street. The revised site plan provides landscaping on these [uo streets �� as Well as [he south side ynrd se[back, [he rea: yard setback, and y y portions of the parkin� lot. H O tn 7. All parties to Che original hearing were given notice of the Applican['s , � proposal. Adequate notice has been glven of the hcaring. � 8. No opposition rras submitted in writing for the proposal. I � 9 The Planning Department of the City of Evcrec[ received letters dated �� Oc[ober 11, 1991, and Octobcr 16, 1991, from an attorney, J. Robert Leach. In these letters Mr. Leach indicated that his clien[, eho was � unidentified, was not able to obtain additional information concerning � the pronosed modifica[ion other [han the information set forth in the I �� notice. According Co the a[tomey, the lack uf information prevented him from determining vhether he had objec[ions to [he proposed modificat7ons. The property own�r's identity was never disclosed. !'� 9. 9t [he hearing no public testimony was presented by witnesses opposing the revision. The only testimony presented at the hearing supported the request. �_� CONCLUSIONS 1. On June 4, 1990, a Special Property Use Permit was �ranted to the �� Applicant for development oF the property at 3711 Smith Street, Everett, L1,� Washington. The permit was issued for the purpose of constructing a 100 bed shelter for single homeless oen and a day center for homeless low income men, women, and children. 2. �n October 15, 1991, [he Executive Dlrector of the Appiicant's operation requested a modificatron of the pexmie. The lfearing lixaminer of the City of Everett scheduled a public hearing for October 31, 1991.