Ordinance 2137-96 - Laserfiche WebLink

• ordinances of the City. Conditions, modifications and restrictions which may be imposed are, but are not limited to: (a) Exact location and nature of development, including additional building and parking area setbacks, screening in the form of landscaped berms, landscaping or fencing; (b) Measures to mitigate the adverse environmental impacts of the development; (c) Hours of use or operation or type and intensity of activities; (d) Sequence and scheduling of development; (e) Maintenance of the development; (f) Duration of use and subsequent removal of structures; (g) Granting of easements and dedications of roads, walkways, utilities or other purposes and dedication of land or other provisions for public facilities, the need for which the examiner finds would be generated in whole or in significant part by the proposed development; (h) Provisions which would bring the proposal into compliance with the comprehensive plan; (i) Posting of assurance devices as required to insure compliance with any conditions, modification and/or restrictions imposed on the proposal. (2) For the purposes of this section, the examiner shall have all the powers of the board of adjustment and the City's planning director. Section 3: Section 3 of Ordinance No. 1969-93 (EMC 2.23.140)which reads as follows: 2.23.140 Concurrent review process. Any person proposing a land use project which would require more than one of the permits or approvals listed in subsection A of Section 2.23.120 or which in addition to at least one such permit or approval would require a conditional use permit or variance under Title 19 of this code, may submit a concurrent application to the planning department, on form(s) furnished by the planning department, containing all necessary information. The concurrent application shall thereafter be jointly processed by the city subject to the most lengthy time limitation applicable to any of the required permits or approvals. For purposes of this section, the examiner shall have all the powers of the board of adjustment. The examiner's decision regarding issuance or denial of a conditional use permit or variance shall have the effect prescribed in this section. If any of the required permits or approvals fall within subdivision A(2) of Section 2.23.120, the decision of the examiner as to all such permits or approvals shall constitute a recommendation to the city council. Otherwise, the decision of the examiner shall be final subject to appeal to the council pursuant to Section 2.23.180. The planning department may prescribe a reduced fee schedule for concurrent applications reflecting cost savings realized through unified processing. When the examiner has an application which includes a development action listed in Section 2.23.120(A) of this chapter which also includes a SEPA appeal, the hearings on the development action and SEPA appeal shall be concurrent. Whenever the hearings are concurrent and a SEPA appeal is involved, the action of the examiner as to both the development action and SEPA appeal shall constitute a recommendation to the city council. be and the same is hereby amended to read as follows: 6