My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3620 36TH PL NE 2018-01-02 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
36TH PL NE
>
3620
>
3620 36TH PL NE 2018-01-02 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/9/2022 11:39:42 AM
Creation date
3/31/2017 8:33:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
36TH PL NE
Street Number
3620
Notes
CEDAR GROVE COMPOSTING CHANGED TO 3620 36TH PL NE PER SABRINA
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
471
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
L <br />• Stockpiles should be kept away from settlement sensitive structures (e.g., the pads), if the stockpile <br />areas are not preloaded. Otherwise the stockpiles may induce settlement under the structures. We <br />recommend a 20-foot minimum setback from the toe of a stockpile to any settlement sensitive <br />structure. <br />• Asphalt concrete (AC) pavement sections recommended for the project are governed by front-end <br />loader traffic (assumed CAT 980) and include 5 inches AC over 15 inches of crushed surfacing base <br />course, over 28 inches of sand/gravel subbase over a geotextile separator. If asphalt treated base <br />(ATB) is used then the recommended section includes 4 inches AC over 8 inches ATB over 28 inches <br />of sand/gravel subbase over a geotextile separator. Less robust pavement sections can be considered <br />1 in areas not subject to front end loader traffic. Note that over -excavation may be required to establish <br />the pavement section thickness while maintaining design grades. Geo-grid reinforcement could be <br />used to reduce the thickness of the subbase and base layers. <br />These geotechnical issues and other considerations are discussed further and recommendations <br />pertaining to the geotechnical aspects of the project are presented in the following sections. <br />4.2 EARTHWORK <br />4.2.1 Erosion and Sedimentation Control <br />Potential sources or causes of erosion and sedimentation depend upon construction methods, slope <br />length and gradient, amount of soil exposed and/or disturbed, soil type, construction sequencing and <br />weather. The project impact on erosion -prone areas can be reduced by implementing an erosion and <br />sedimentation control plan. The plan should be designed in accordance with applicable city and/or county <br />standards. The plan should incorporate basic planning principles including: <br />• Scheduling grading and construction to minimize soil exposure, <br />• Retaining existing vegetation whenever feasible, <br />• Revegetating or mulching denuded areas, <br />• Directing runoff away from denuded areas, <br />• Minimizing the length and steepness of slopes with exposed soils, <br />• Decreasing runoff velocities, <br />• Preparing drainage ways and outlets to handle concentrated or increased runoff, <br />• Confining sediment to the project site, and <br />• Inspecting and maintaining control measures frequently. <br />Temporary erosion protection should be used and maintained in areas with exposed or disturbed soils <br />to help minimize erosion and reduce transport of sediment to adjacent areas and receiving waters. <br />Permanent erosion protection should be provided by re-establishing vegetation by hydroseeding or <br />landscape planting. <br />Until the permanent erosion protection is established and the site is stabilized, site monitoring should <br />be performed by qualified personnel to evaluate the effectiveness of the erosion control measures and <br />ly <br />G e o E n g i n e e r s 9 File No. 10625-001-021123003 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.