My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3620 36TH PL NE 2018-01-02 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
36TH PL NE
>
3620
>
3620 36TH PL NE 2018-01-02 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/9/2022 11:39:42 AM
Creation date
3/31/2017 8:33:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
36TH PL NE
Street Number
3620
Notes
CEDAR GROVE COMPOSTING CHANGED TO 3620 36TH PL NE PER SABRINA
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
471
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
For walls that are free to yield at the top at least one -thousandth of the height of the wall, soil <br />pressures will be less than if movement is limited by such factors as wall stiffness or bracing. Assuming <br />0-at the walls are backfilled and drainage is provided is outlined in the following paragraphs, we <br />recommend that yielding walls supporting horizontal backfill be designed using an equivalent fluid <br />density of 35 pcf (triangular distribution), while nonyielding walls supporting horizontal backfill be <br />designed using an equivalent fluid density of 55 pcf (triangular distribution). <br />We recomment? that the allowable passive resistance be computed using an equivaent fluid density of <br />300 pounds per cubic foot (pcf) if these elements are surrounded by structural fill. The structural fill <br />should extend rut from the face of the foundation element for a distance at least equal to three times the <br />height of the element and be compacted to at least 95 percent of the NMI). An additional rectangular <br />distribution of 6H psf (rectangular distribution) should be applied for the seismic lateral earth pressure, <br />where H is :he exposed height of the retaining structure. <br />The above soil pressures assume that the walls will be (1) constructed on a minimum 2-foot thick <br />structural fill pled as described for building foundations in Section 4.4, (2) backfilled with properly <br />compacted imparted structural fill, and (3) that wall drains will be installed to prevent the buildup of <br />hydrostatic pressure behind ttue walls, as discussed below. <br />Positive drainage should be provided behind any permanent conventional cast -in -place subsurface <br />walls by pl•,cing a minimum 2-foot wide zone of pea gravel or gravel backfill for walls immediately <br />adjacent to the walls. Gravel backfill for walls should conform to Section 9-03.12(2) of the 2002 <br />I WSDOT Standard Specifications. The gravel backfill for walls zone should extend from the base of the <br />wall to within I foot of the finished ground surface behind the wall. The top 1-foot of fill should consist <br />of relatively impermeable soil to prevent infiltration of surface water into the wall drainage zone. <br />Weep holes at about 8-foot centers at the base of the wall should he installed to drain water from <br />exterior walls. Alternatively, a perforated drainpipe may be embedded at the base of the wall in the <br />t gravel backfill for walls to remove water that collects in this zone. <br />4.7 EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING <br />4.7.1 Liquefaction Potential <br />Liquefaction refers to the condition where vibration or shaking of the ground, usually from <br />earthquake forces, results in the development of excess pore pressures in saturated soils with subsequent <br />loss of strength in the deposit of soil so affected. In general, soils that are susceptible to liquefaction <br />include very loose to medium dense, clean to silty sands that are below the water table. <br />The results of our analyses indicate that several zones in the loose to medium dense sandy soils <br />encountered in the explorations below the organic silt have a moderate to high potential for liquefaction <br />during a design earthquake event, and a moderate potential during an event with a lower level of ground <br />shaking. The organic silt and silt deposits located above the sand have a low potential for liquefaction <br />during a design earthquake (a magnitude 6.5 earthquake with a PGA of 0 27g). <br />Our analyses indicate that settlements caused by liquefaction of the saturated loose to medium dense <br />sand layers at this site during a design earthquake could be on the order of 3 to 6 inches. Foundations for <br />the planned structures will be constructed over the liquefiable soils and will therefore be prrne to <br />L� <br />G c 0 E n g i n e e r s 19 File No. 10625 001-02.)I23003 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.