My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3620 36TH PL NE 2018-01-02 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
36TH PL NE
>
3620
>
3620 36TH PL NE 2018-01-02 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/9/2022 11:39:42 AM
Creation date
3/31/2017 8:33:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
36TH PL NE
Street Number
3620
Notes
CEDAR GROVE COMPOSTING CHANGED TO 3620 36TH PL NE PER SABRINA
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
471
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I I 4.8 PAVEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS <br />4.8.1 General <br />The pavement design analyses were completed using the design methodology outlined in the <br />1993 AASHTO Guide for Design of Pavement Structures (AASHTO Guide). The traffic loading <br />information was assumed as summarized below: <br />• Average daily traffic (ADT) <br />• 75 trucks — about 50 residential route trucks and 25 semi -trucks, and <br />(' • 360 one-way trips for a Cat 980 front-end loader (3 minute cycle time over 9 hours) <br />• Percent growth of 2 percent for next 20 years <br />• 100 percent trucks or front end loaders in the design lane <br />• Traffic occurs 5 days per week <br />i <br />In our pavement design analyses, we assumed the following: <br />• 20-year dep;-; life <br />• Reliability or . ) percent <br />• Initial serviceabilit- rf4.2 <br />• Terminal serviceability of 2 <br />• Overall standard deviation of 0.45 <br />• Truck load factor of 20 for a CAT 980 front-end loader <br />• California Bearing Ratio (CBR) for suhgmde soils of 2, which corresponds approximately to a <br />resilient modulus of 3,000 pounds per square inch (psi) <br />Using the information presented above we developed pavement recommendations for 32.1 million <br />18-kip equivalent single axle loads (ESALs). <br />4.8.2 Asphalt Concrete Pavement <br />Using the input parameters described above and the methodology presented in the AASHTO Guide, <br />we recommend the alternative asphalt concrete pavement sections presented in Tables 3 and 4 be <br />considered for the project. <br />Table 3. Recommend Asphalt Concrete Pavement Sections (front-end loader traffic areas) <br />I <br />1,1111111111.111 <br />e d - cltiiess�x�� <br />Jr. � ", aterial <br />M.Wen <br />70 , � <br />QP,T(O. , <br />, , ,_ TfO,. � <br />r.,nr�+:.OPTlON44?�,1; <br />Ad, Class B <br />ATBr <br />5 <br />4 <br />I 3 <br />1 5 <br />I 4 <br />& <br />CSBC' <br />15 <br />I <br />I 3 <br />Tensar BX1100 <br />Geogrid <br />No <br />No <br />i Yes <br />No <br />Sand/GravelSubbase <br />23 <br />j 23 <br />12 <br />1 12 <br />TensarBX1200 <br />Geogrid <br />No <br />No <br />Yes <br />Yes <br />'AC = As halt Concrete Pavement, Class B per WSDOT Specifications 5-04 and 9.03. <br />=ATB = Asphalt Treated Base, per WSDOT Specifications 4-06 and 9-03. <br />'CSBC = Crushed Surfacing Base Course, per WSDOT Specifications 9-03.9(3). <br />G e 0 E n g i n e e r s 21 Pile No. 10625-001-02/123003 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.