2113 44TH ST SE 2016-01-01 MF Import

i � r � sonan oF nnausxMErrt , FINDINGS, CONCLIISIONS AND OEDER JANOARY 7, 1985 I i FILE 626-84 I I IBased upon the written request for a variance from the City's zoning Icode, specifically 19.16.050, A 6 B, made by Jule VanDerMeerache at 2113 - , ' I 44th S.E. , hereinafter referred to as "Applicant," the Soard of Adjustment, I S I following a publ3c hearing on said application held on January 7, 1985, and i � i� further having reviewed all testimony, makes the iollowing Findings, I z 0 � �IConclusions, and Order: I � il � m I` i I FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: .. .� ...� T� I 1. That there have been exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or ' v�= � conditions applying to the subject property or as to the intended use c o , � thereof that do not apply generally to other properties in the same m � � vicinity or zone. -� c r I o - m '� � a, Finding: The applicant owns a parcel of property at 2113 - _ -+ � i m .. 44th S.E. The property is a corner lot 50' x 120'. A single p z � i family residence was moved on the site seven (7) fzet from the y � � property line ad jacent to 44th Street. The house sits on blocks I ,.r., � I noW. The applicant has had a diEficult time making the home < �' '�i mower place it in its appropriate location. � o A � �i b. Conclusion: The extraordinary circumstances are related to the i "' fact that the moving contractor thought the setback was five (5) m � N � feet. The appl:cant has Cried to get the contractor to move the o m � house to its appropriate location with no luck. The front yard c cn setback for thie house is consistent with the other dwellinge on m `" the block. Z �' --i r , m n 2. That such variance is necessary for the preservation and en�oyment of a A substantial property right of the appellant possessed by the owners of s� other properties in the same vicinity or zone. � � a. Finding: The applicant's property is located in an R-2 zone, I � � corner lot, adjacent to 4th and 44th which are 80' R.O.W. �' z c b. Conclusion: This variancn uould not a:fect the public street �-� � which has significant amount of right-of-way that is not being � � used by the City. Most all of the right-of-way is being used by ad�acent propercy owners for lawn. I � I 3. That the authorization of such variance will not be materially i , detrimental to the public welfare or in3urious to property in the vicinity or zone in vhich the property ia located. � a. Finding: Fourth and 44th Street are 80' public right-of-way. ` The variance is adjacent to 44th and 4th. ' b. Conclusion: Granting the variance crould have no adverse effect on properCy in the area. ( i i: Ufll;::�------ -----_ - i�L1ti"riY �(P�� L"G.C_fli i p i . . . y-�� /(r�0 "� .a J': S !:,(:I( ��i' J� � ' ;�,..�... �/�/G��-.� F�._ � - _� rlGft6f --- ��Lt:,.;,:c _ , i !?!(fA?J �'�Uc _ . 0405F -1- i i�_�� � � .,