417 49TH ST SW 2016-01-01 MF Import

�. � I J. i : . � . l..L l . - ._,. ..,: 1�. . . . ... . ,. .,.. (�j�li �i�lt [9IIER�AS, theretofore, there was filed a:ith the City of Everett Planning Department on (date) November 15, 1974 an application for a variance of Section No..080 of Everett City Code No. 15.04 by (applicant) David Brandvold — (address) 3423 Shore Avenue, Everett, �9A for (specif.ic variance requested) pennission to divi.de a tract of land into four (9) parcels of which two (2) parcels wil'1 have a minimum of fifty (50) feet of frontage on a publi.c dediceted street. One parcel to have a forty (40) foot frontage on a public dedicated street and the fourth parcel to have ingress and egress over a thirty-five foot easement across the parcel which �•rill have the forty (40) foot of frontage on a public dedicated street. Zoning: R-1 Single Pamily Residential. on the follo�ai.ng described property: The South 163.8 feet of the N1 of the Si of the Ni9; of the SE; of Secti.on 36, Twp. 29 N Rge. 4 T.W.M. Pxcept the �ast 210 feet of the North 150 ft. throi Address: Approximately A900 Vista Place F�ND: WH�FBAS, (date) January 6, 1975 was fixed as the date of hearing on said application and proper notice having been given as required by law. AND: 4�IiEREAS, a public hearing was held on said date and the Board of Adjustment, after reviecoinq all testimony, made the findings that: 1. That there are exceptional circumstances applying to the subject property tliat do not apply to other properties in the same vicinity or zone, specifically that cahile there is sufficient lot area to divide the parcel into four lots, the existence of a publicly dedicated street (4°th Streei:) to provide frontage to the fourth lot. 2. That such variance is necessary ior the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the appellant possessed by the owners c:f other properties in the same vicinity or zone, speciiically that all other things Uein9 equal, the applicant has the right to develop this property into four parcels exceot for the frontage requirement, said requi.rement being impossible to fulfill because of ttie adjacent house. 3. That the authorization of such variance will not be materially detrimental to thc- r,ublic we].£are or injurious to property in the vicinity, sr,ecifically that other properties will Uc no more uffected k�y this proposal than by a situation where all four l.ots froilted on a pub]_icly dedicated street. �l. That the �ranti:ig`of this va;:iance will not adversely af£ect the comprehensive plan. NOW, THERLFORE, based on the foregoing findings: BE IT ORDERLD BY 'PAT.':'CITY OI' �VERETT BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT that said appli- cation be Granted ; with tl�e following stipulations: 1. That the actual driveway to the most westerly lot shall be a minimum of sixteen feet in width and paved caith asphalt. 2. That the easement and driveway shall be privately and ef.fect- ively maintained. 3. That additional right of �,�ay �vidth, 13.8 feet, shall be dedi- cated to the City t,*hen L-he property is divided. 4. That a uti.lit}� easement sha].1 be pr.ovided across I�Ir, 13randvold's properl.y at thc i:ime it is divided.