My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3321 52ND PL SW 2016-01-01 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
52ND PL SW
>
3321
>
3321 52ND PL SW 2016-01-01 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/24/2017 3:55:28 PM
Creation date
3/31/2017 3:54:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
52ND PL SW
Street Number
3321
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
110
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
. -'t <br />Geotechnical �ngineering [nvestigation � , <br />Schwab Residence <br />July 13, 2001 <br />NGA File No. 329401 <br />Page 6 <br />the site, although we did not observe recent indications of this. The potential for sloughing may <br />be reduced by routing surface water away from the top of slope, maintaining vegetation on the <br />slope, and replacing vegetation removed during construction. With the recommended effective <br />setback,these sloughing events should notadversely impactlhe residence. <br />RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS <br />General <br />It is our opinion that the soils, which underlie the site and form the core of the slope, are <br />considered stable with respect to deep-seated earth movements, due to their inherent strength and <br />slope geometry. There is potential for shallow sloughing and erosion events to occur on ihe <br />steeper portions of the slope. We have provided recommendations to reduce the potential of such <br />events and a minimum foundation effective setback distance to reduce the risk of adverse impacts <br />to the residence should such events occur. <br />The residence could be supported on conventional shallow spread footings, provided that the <br />foundation excavation is advanced through any surficial fill, topsoil, or loose material and <br />extended down to medium dense or Ixtter native soils. In addition to this criterion, the downhill <br />footing line should be embedded a minimum of three feet into the competent native material and <br />at the same time satisfy a minimum horizontal setback distance of 15 feet between the face of the <br />slope and the bottom of the footing line. <br />It will be important to maintain the vegetation on the slope to reduce the erosion potential. The <br />occurrence of sloughing on the slope can be reduced by routing storm run-off into appropriate <br />stormwater lines away from the slope or piping storm water to the base of the slope. <br />The silry soils likely to be exposed during construction are considered moisture-sensitive and may <br />disturb when wet. We recommend that construction take place durin� the drier summer months, <br />if possible. If construction takes place during the wet season, additional expenses and delays <br />should be expected due to the wet conditions. Additional expenses could include the need to <br />esport on-site soil, the import of clean, granular soil for fill, and the need to place a blanket of <br />rock spalls or crushed rock in the construction traffic areas and exposed subgrades prior to <br />placing structural fill or structural elements. The on-site soils may be used as structural fill <br />provided they could be compacted to plan specifications. We should be retained to determine if <br />the on-site soils could be used as structural ill at the time of conshuction. After grading, the <br />NELSON GEOTECHN/CAL ASSOC/ATES, /NC. $I/q <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.