My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
3321 52ND PL SW 2016-01-01 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
52ND PL SW
>
3321
>
3321 52ND PL SW 2016-01-01 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/24/2017 3:55:28 PM
Creation date
3/31/2017 3:54:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
52ND PL SW
Street Number
3321
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
110
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
C <br />- � , Geotechnicai Engineering Investigation <br />Schwab Residence <br />]uly 13, 2001 <br />NGA File No. 329401 <br />�'age 7 <br />exposed subgrade should be protected from construction tra�c and surfaa: runoff. <br />Erosion Control Measures <br />The erosion hazard for the on-site soils in the gently-sloping portion of the site is listed as slight <br />and as moderate to high for the steeply sloping portions of the site, depending on how the site is <br />gr�ded and water is allowed to concentrate. Best Management Practices (BMPs) should be used <br />to control erosion. Areas disturbed during construction should be protected from erosion. <br />Measures taken may include diverting surface water away from the sVipped areas and ;iom <br />flowing over the slope. Silt fences or straw bales should be erected to prevent muddy water from <br />leaving the site or flowing over the top of the slope. Disturbed areas should be planted with <br />vegetation at the end of construction. The vegetation should be maintained until established. The <br />erosion potential of areas not stripped of vegetation should be low. <br />Setback From t6e Slope <br />Uncertainties related to building along steep slopes ara typically addressed by the use of building <br />setbacks. The purpose of the setback is to establish a"buffer zone" between the dwelling areas <br />and the slope margin, so that ample room is allowed for nortnal slope surFace regression, or if a <br />slope failure were to occur. This setback also prutects the slope from the impacts of the <br />development. From a geological standpoint, a reasonable setback is based on the slope's physical <br />characteristics; e.g., slope height, surface angle, material composition, hydrology, etc. Other <br />factors s�ch as historical slope activity, rate of regression and earthwork activity along the tce of <br />slope, a�e important considerations as well. <br />Based on our slope evaluation and observations, we recommend a minimum effective horizontal <br />setback distance of 15 feet between the face of the slope and the bottom of the downhill footing <br />line. In addition to this recommended setback distance, the downhill footing line should be <br />embedded a minimum of 3 feet into medium dense or better native soils. The recommended <br />setback and footing embedment values are shown on Figure 7. We should be retained to evaluate <br />the residence foundation subgrade and effective setback prior to pouring footings. <br />Slope and Setback Protection <br />Protection of the setback and steep slope areas should be pe��formed as required by the City of <br />Everett. Specifically, we recommend that the setback areas not be used for placeme�t or storage <br />of fill materials, including "temporary" excavation spoils from building area preparation and <br />lVELSON GEOTECHNICAL ASSOC/ATES, /NC. � <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.