Laserfiche WebLink
appear to encroach 2 feet 8%z inches into the City's right-of-way, <br />however it should not disrupt any City improvements. Both Wall 1 and <br />Wall 2 were engineered to plan specifications, and were inspected by <br />a geotechnical engineer with Nelson Geotechnical Associates, Inc. <br />b. Conclusions: The City provided written notice to all property �wners <br />within 300 feet of the subject site. Several letters were received by <br />the City from neighboring properry owners both in support and <br />opposition of the proposed variance; they have been included as <br />exhibits #10-13. <br />Although Wall 2 may encroach into the City's right-of-way any <br />questions or concems related to development within the right-of-way <br />should be directed to the City of Everett Public Works Department. <br />Based upon a brief discussion with public works staff, there does not <br />appear to be a problem with Wall 2's location within the City right-of- <br />way at this time. <br />Criterion No. 3: <br />That the variance will only grant the subject property the same general rights <br />enjoyed by other property in the same area and zone as the subject property. <br />a. Fin�dings: The applicant has stated that many property owners along <br />52 Place S.W. have retaining walls over 36 inches in height within <br />the front 20 foot setback, which manipulate the front yard topography <br />to provide a more pleasing entrance and level yard area. <br />Upon review of the Ciry's permit database, no applications for <br />retaining walls over 36 inches in height within setbacks were found <br />for properties immediately surrounding the subject site. <br />b. Conclusions: Although several retaining walls exceeding 36 inches <br />in height may exist on neighboring properties it has not been <br />determined that they are located within setback areas, as is the case <br />with the subject property. <br />Criterion No. 4: <br />That the variance is the minimum necessary to allow the subject property the <br />general rights described in Criterion 3. <br />a. Findinys: See Criteria #�. <br />b. Conclusions: See Criteria #3 <br />:�n No. 5• <br />The gra�ting of the variance is consistent with the goals and policies of the <br />Everett General Plan. <br />a. Findings: The Everett General Plan designates this property as 1.1, <br />Single Family Detached, 3-5 Dwellings per gross acre. <br />3�� <br />