700 52ND ST SE 2016-01-01 MF Import

property because 2 wanted to avoid any damage to my trees. This would include tearing the bark on any trees on my property. 2 was thinking a situation where a logger might take bark off a tree when breaking the branches or cutting off parts of the branches that are on my property. David did not really say anything about my suggestiun, so 2 am assume he did not agree with it. You both mentioned prior damage to your property, including the tv�ie when the developers of the area 2 lived in, pushed earth, etc. onto your property, which I believe was then owned by your Mother and Father. I am sympathetic to you and your family that those incidants occurred. But, I know that you agree that they should not lesson your responsibilities as far as anything on my property. I told you, Dan, that I recognize your right to log on your own land. However, I want to make very clear to both of you and your other brother, the trees on my property ara very, very important to me in many ways, including financially. While it would be my wish that we cooperate and avoid any problems which might occur during the logging operation and which might necessitate getting lawyers involved, I must tell both of you, in no uncertain terms, my views about this. Under no circumstances, do I want any tree located on my property to be cut or damaged in sny way. As noted above, I have sprayed the cuts made by your surveyors. I do not want any more of such cuts. David, you mentioned to me, in so many words, that if someone cut down a tree on someone else's property they can be paid stumpage. In other words that would be the limit of that person's liability. That my be true in a rural and mountainous areas, but certainly not in residential areas such as where my property is located. One of my key rEasons for purchasing the property was the trees. Any loss of a tree or trees would result in damage to my property far in excess of any "stumpage compensation." It is possible you may find a lawyer who would give you a different opinion than mine, but I would challenge that througY. the various levels of the court system. I hope that I do not have to do that, but I 3lS