My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
700 52ND ST SE 2016-01-01 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
52ND ST SE
>
700
>
700 52ND ST SE 2016-01-01 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/24/2017 3:40:13 PM
Creation date
3/31/2017 4:08:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
52ND ST SE
Street Number
700
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
79
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Impact Analysis <br />All tree harvest will occur outside of critical areas and their buffers, therefore no impacts are proposed <br />within Wetland A, Pigeon Creek or their buffers. <br />Proposed Mitigatlon Plan <br />No impacts are proposed in association with the proposed tree harvest. Therefore, no mitigation is <br />proposed. The 75-ft buffer of Wetland A shall be marked prior to trae harvest in order to avoid <br />unintended tree removal within the critical area buffer. <br />Discla�mer <br />It should be recognized that the delineatioNdetermination of wetlano boundaries and fundional <br />values are inexact sciences. Individual professionals will often disagree on the precise location of <br />wetland or stream boundaries, or the functional values of a spec�c habitat. The final determination of <br />wetland and stream boundaries is the responsibility of the resource agencies that regulate activities in <br />and around wetiands and streams. Accordingly, all wetland and str��am delineations perfortned for <br />this study, as well as the conclusions drawn in this report, should be reviewed by the appropriate <br />regulatory agencies prior to any detailed site planning or construction activities. <br />Within the limitations of schedule, budget, and scope-of-work, we warrant that this study was <br />conducted in accordance with generally accepted environmental science practices, inciuding the <br />technical guidelines and criteria in eHect at the time this study was pertortned. The resuks and <br />conclusions of this repart represent the authors' best professional judgment, based upon information <br />provided by the project �proponent in additio^ to that obtained during the course of this study. No <br />other warranty, expressed or imFlied, is made. <br />13 <br />Ib <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.