2908 25TH ST 2016-01-01 MF Import

��ter�on No 2• That the variance vill not be matPrially �etrimental to the property in the area of the subject property or to the City as a whole. a,F;^�-- ��s A letter was received and is attached as exhib.it number ' 5 from E.J. Gold which objected to the variance request if the property were to be used for a duplex or multiple family use, however had no objection if the property were to remain a single family residence. ' , b. Cn^^��;�n�- There is not sufficient Iot �rea to allow a � . duplex or multiple family use of the prop�:rty. The vanance should not be materially detrimental to the property in the ' area of the subject property or to the City as a whole. � :'- . Criterion No. 3• �; i That the variance will only qrant the subject propercy the same ; : � general rights enjoyed by other property in the same area and zone as the sub�ect property. � j a• x;*+�: The adjacent properties are developed with �, � residential structures which were built in the early 1900's, � many of which do not meet current setback requirements. b, r•+•,��„�;n��- The variance will grant the subject property the same rights enjoyed by other existinq properties in the same zane as the subject property. Criterion No. 4- That the variance is the minimum necessary to allow the subject I property the qeneral rights described in Criterion 3. a. �i�: See Criteria �3. b• �^^^�"A�^^a• The V8I'18IICe 18 the mifllml3ID neCessBZ'y to sllow the subject property the qeneral riqhts describe in Criterion 3. ,I Criterion No. 5: ` - ` The granting of the variance is not inconsistent with the qoals and �' ,y ; policies of the Ecerett General Plan. 'E I� ; a. Findinqa: The Everett General Plan designates this property n as 1.2 Single Family Residential. i; � '; I I,_,,' �;. . i k!r !,' }1 4 1 6 :� . �` . . . � � . � �� . �. � : . � � . 7"�= � � � I � � i. � h ..;.....:.,..,... __. ._...__. ... . __.__.--__' _._ _-_' . . . _ _ . �Pf 5 . .. .. . . . � .. .�.., :� .. , . _. . .�_... . . . . � .. .i�