Laserfiche WebLink
The City has not enforced the zoning standard violations of that property. <br />(finding 9) <br />6. The City has had knowledge and a reasonable opportunity to discover the facts <br />and circumstances of the inferior lot that was created as part �f the tax <br />segregation of 1982. <br />The Appellants and their predecesso:�s f�isve acted on the City's tacit approval of <br />the development of the lot, as it exits today. They have ex�ended monies <br />through development, maintenance, and financing of the structure over a long, <br />long period of time. For the City to enforce the strict zoning standards of the R-S <br />zone significant costs and disruption would result to the Appellants. <br />8. The decision of this matter is based on the immediate facts of this case. It is not <br />made for the establishment of any precedent for future cases within the City of <br />Everett. 6ecause of the unique factors that are involved in this matter, the <br />reasoning for this ciecision is limited only to the instant facts. <br />DEC�SION <br />Based upon the precedi;ig Findinr:, of Fact and Conclusions and testimony and <br />evidence submitted at the public hearing, it is hereby ordered that the City of EveretPs <br />Planning Department decision denying the application by Henry and Constance <br />Chapman for a non-conforming lot certificaticn of the property at 5102 — 33rd Avenue <br />West, Everett, Washington is overturned and that the non-conforming lot ce�tification is <br />granted for this property based on the specific facts of this case. With this lot <br />certification, the Appellants are given no additional development rights, other than those <br />as set forth for R-S zoned properfies. <br />Done and dated this 3`d day of FeFruary, 2005. <br />�w � ��� <br />Jam� . Drisr,oll <br />Heanng Examiner <br />4 <br />�� <br />