Laserfiche WebLink
Criterion No. 2. That such variance is necessary for the ,reservation and <br />enjoyment of a substantial property right of the <br />appellant possessed by the owners of other properties in <br />the same vicinity or zone. <br />a. Finding #2: This is an area of view <br />this variance will allow the applicant to <br />advantage of the view potential. <br />homes and <br />take full <br />b. Conclusion #2: The variance is necessary for the <br />preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property <br />right possessed by others in the vicinity and zone. <br />Criterion No. 3. That the authorization of such variance will not be <br />materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious <br />to property in the vicinity or zone in which the <br />property is located. <br />a. Finding #3: No adverse comments have been <br />received in response to notification of property <br />owners within three hundred feet of the subject <br />property. <br />Public works has commented that 33rd Avenue West <br />will be improved in the future when the vacant <br />parcel to the east develops and questions whether <br />seven and one-half feet would be an adequate <br />setback. City code requires a ten foot side yard <br />setback for corner lots and since in the future when <br />33rd Avenue West develops, this will function as a <br />side yard, it seems reasonable to require that at a <br />minimum the setback on the east be ten feet for <br />future health and safety of the resident and of the <br />public using the strut. <br />It does not appear that views from the homes to the <br />south would be adversely affected if this variance <br />were granted, and in fact, may allow additional view <br />for them that they would not have if the house were <br />built with the required 40-foot- setback from the <br />east property line. <br />b. Conclusion #3: It does not appear that granting a <br />variance would be detrimental to the public welfare <br />or to other property in the vicinity or zone if a <br />variance were granted to allow a ten foot east side <br />setback. <br />Criterion No. 4. That the granting of such variance will not adversely <br />affect the Comprehensive General Plan. <br />a. Finding #4: The proposed use is in conformance with <br />the Comprehensive Plan designation of Single Family <br />Residential, one to five dwelling units per acre. <br />b. Conclusion #4: Granting this variance will not <br />adversely affect the Comprehensive Plan. <br />-2- <br />