Laserfiche WebLink
sc 130 Milbor-Pitaa'vR°C <br />Association of State Highway Transportation Officials (AASHTO) design methodology, <br />we determined that Soil Profile Type II is appropriate for use in design. The <br />corresponding Site Coefficient is 1.2. <br />Design ground acceleration for the project alignment was determined using results from <br />the seismic maps presented in the WSDOT Bridge Design Manual, based on the Nalional <br />Seismic Hazards Mapping Project completed by USGS in 1996. WSDOT's maps <br />present horizontal bedrock accelerations associated with a 10 percent probability of <br />exceedence in a 50-year period. Interpolation between iso-seismic contours on the <br />WSDOT seismic map indicates peak ground acceleration (PGA) at the project site of <br />approximately 0.28 gravities (g). For comparison, using AASHTO design seismic maps <br />indicate a PGA of approximately 0.23g for Everett. It is important to note, however, that <br />the AASHTO maps have not been revised to incorporate the results of the recent USGS <br />mapping project, and are outdated based on that data. Initial results of the Seismic <br />Hazards inventory of Puget Sound (SHIPS) project indicate that the accelerations could <br />be significantly higher due to the geometry of the fault zones surrounding Everett. Some <br />Seismologists have suggested that a PGA of 0.32 would be more accurate. <br />5.2.2 Regional Seismicity <br />The seismicity of the Puget Sound area is not well understood. This is due to several <br />factors such as the lack of historical records. Another difficulty is the deep deposits of <br />glacial materials that obscure the surface expression of bedrock faults. Recent analyses <br />of the seismic epicenters do not show a specific pattern indicating a fault zone. The <br />SHIPS project uses air gun blasts (in water) and underground explosions (in borings) to <br />create shock waves that are mapped with seismographs. This provides a detailed cross <br />section of the rock and glacial materials. Initial results show a series of faults where the <br />Southern side has been thrust north and over the adjoining block. Everett and Seattle <br />appear to be bracketed by these fault zones. More information will become available <br />after the East-West profile has been completed in September 1999. <br />5.2.3 Soil Liquefaction <br />Liquefaction occurs when loose, saturated and relatively cohesionless soil deposits <br />temporarily lose strength as a result of vibration or earthquake shaking. Primary factors <br />controlling the development of liquefaction include intensity and duration of strong <br />ground motion, characteristics of subsurface soil, in -situ stress conditions and the depth <br />to groundwater. Potential effects of soil liquefaction include temporary loss of bearing <br />capacity and lateral soil resistance. Excessive ground movements (horizontal or vertical) <br />may also occur as a result of liquefaction. <br />The results of our subsurface investigation indicate that the soils underlying the site <br />consist of cohesive clays and glacially overconsolidated sands and silty sands. In <br />addition, the near -surface soils are not saturated, as the regional groundwater level at the <br />site is typically 35-39 feet below the ground surface. For these reasons, neither the clays <br />nor the glacial sands are susceptible to earthquake -induced liquefaction, and therefore the <br />potential for significant liquefaction -induced settlement and lateral spreading of soils <br />beneath bridge piers is low, in our opinion. <br />6tviLchnical, Tunnel and Enviromnenhd ERineers <br />3080 125° Ave NE Phone (425) 969-5778 <br />lkllcwc, WA 98005 P38e9 Fu (425)861-0677 <br />