Laserfiche WebLink
�� � <br /> ANALYSIS OF THE PARKING REQUIREFSENTS FOR <br /> EVERETT SENIUR CONGREGATF. CARE FACILITY <br /> April 11, 1964 <br /> Phases One and 'I��o - Semi-independant and independant living <br /> units: <br /> 346 units proposed <br /> 1 parking stall per unit* = 348 parking stalls <br /> Phase Three - Nursing home <br /> maximum 200 beds proposed <br /> 1 parking stall per 5 beds = 40 parking stalls <br /> Total parking stalls reauired 388 I <br /> Total parkinq stalls proposed 414 <br /> *The parking regulations for the City of Everett do not <br /> establish a reguirement for elderly housing. Therefore, <br /> a standard of one parking stall per unit was use, �ohich <br /> is hetcveen the .20 parking stalls per bed reRuired for <br /> a nursing home and the 1. 5 stalls per unit required for <br /> a multi-family residence. <br /> This is the same �tandard used for Cristwo,�d, a senior <br /> conRregate �are facility sponsored by Crista Ministries, <br /> even though King County approved a variance for the facility <br /> which allo�ved only . 35 parking stalls per unit. <br /> Since the construction of Cristwood, research has shown <br /> that one parking stall per unit provides more than ample <br /> parking. One of the directors of Crista sites an example <br /> where the residents of a 99 unit complex for seniors have <br /> a total of 13 cars betwcen them. This averaqes out to a <br /> ratio of .13 parking stalls per unit, which is attributed <br /> to the fact that residents coMe to rely on bus service to <br /> the point where their own cars are not needed. The majority <br /> of res`dents within such a facility sell their cars within <br /> the first year after moving in. <br />