Laserfiche WebLink
GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING STUDY I <br /> Costco Wholesale � <br /> c/o Barghausen Consulting Engineers E-8556 <br /> January 13, 1999 Page 3 <br /> Laboratorv Testinq i <br /> Laboratory tests were conducted on several representative soil samples to verify or modify � <br /> the field soil cla�sification and to evaluate the general physical properties and engineering ! <br /> characteristics of the soil encountered. Moisture content tests were performed on all samples. i <br /> The resu�ts of laboratory tests performed on specific samples are provided in Appendix B, or <br /> at the appropriate sample depth on the boring logs. It is important to note that these test <br /> resul[s may not accurately represent the overall in-situ soil conditions. Our geotechnical <br /> recommendations are based on our interpretation of these test results and their use in guiding <br /> our engineering judgement. ECI cannot be responsible for the interpretation of these data by <br /> others. <br /> In accordance with our Standard Fee Schedule and General Conditions, the soil samples for <br /> this project will be discarded �fter a period of fifteen days following completion of this report <br /> unless we are otherwise directed in writing. <br /> DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS li <br /> General �I <br /> Based on the results of our study, it is our opinion the proposed development can be <br /> constructed generaliy as planned provided the recommendations contained in this report are <br /> incorporated into the final design. The critical geotechnical aspects of the planned <br /> development are associated with foundation support for the fueling canopy, construction of <br /> a stable excavation for the underground storage tanks, and controlling groundwater seepage, <br /> if encountered, in the planned excavations. <br /> In our opinion, the proposed fueling canopy can be supporied on conventional spread and <br /> continuous footings bearing on the competent native soils underlying the fill deposit or new <br /> structurai fill. The proposed controller enclosure can be similarly supported. The existing fill <br /> can be considered for use as structural fill, provided the fill can be compacted to the <br /> specifications of structural fill described in the "Site Preparation and General Earthwork" <br /> section of the report. As mentioned previously, the native soils were encountered below <br /> depths of approximateiy three feet at the boring locations. Specific recommendations for <br /> foundations are presented in the "Foundations" section of this report. <br /> Enrth Consultunts, Inc. <br /> � <br />