Laserfiche WebLink
nai2a�2nns n�:zs r,�z 4zs z,2 �z,s aon�*�i�-r �.... , <br />r <br />` ___. �._ , r.: t h2 pUbllc h0alth satery and weitare wowo �e serveo ir [ne pro�ect is aesignea ana <br />,,,,.,a;rctcted in accordance with this decision and applicable CitV Standards. <br />3. Any alteratfons pertnitted to the requirements of (the Zoning (:ode) shafl be the minlmum <br />necessary to ail�w for reasona4le use of the property. <br />Finding: Ido modiFcations to the building setbadcs from property lines are proposed. It is possible that <br />in order to ninimize grading impacts that may resuit from a reorientation of the bwlding, the applicanl <br />w�ll need to reduce the front setback. <br />Conclusion: With the conditions listed in this decision, the proposed buffer and setback reductions <br />would be the minimum necessary to aliow for reasonabie use of the property. <br />4. The inability of the applicant to derive reasonable econor ad ustinf a boundary line thereby sult <br />of actions by the appllcant in subdividing the property J g <br />creating the undevelopabie condition after the eifective data o; the (the Zoning Code) <br />Finding• The subject property consists of an existing legally created 7,475 square-foot lot. The lot <br />exceeds the minimum zoning requirements ior lot area, v�idth and deplh. No changes in the lot fines or <br />lol configuration are proposed. The site was separated from a larger parcel while the property was still <br />in Snohomish County jurisdiction. The larger portion was protected as a sensitive areas tract. The <br />parcel in question represents the rerriainder, and perhaps :nust developabte portion of the orginal <br />properly. Given the critical areas on the Iarger parcel, e'��s .i �.vithout that previous boundary adjustment, <br />a reasonable use exception would Iikeiy be appropriate for the present site. <br />Conclusion: The need (or a reasonable use exception is not the resuil o� actions by the appiicanl. <br />5. The proposal mitigates the impac;s on thc environmentaSly sensitive areas to tlie maximum <br />extent possible. <br />Findinp: The proposal is'o compensate the impact of 358 s.i. of reduced buffer area by increasing <br />the buffer west of the house by 1,095 s.f. resulling in protection of alrnost 4,345 s.f. of sensiiive <br />areas 2nd buf(ers. As condilioned, the proposed 358 s.f. reduction wouid be eliminated and the <br />proposed increased buf(er area may be reduced. However, tha total area to be protected will not be <br />reduced. <br />Conclusion: As conditicned, adequate mitigation ot project impacts will be provided. <br />DECfSION: The proposed reasonable use application for a single family residence on a 7,475 square toot <br />lot is approved, s�bject to the following conditions: <br />1, A single family residence is authorized to be conshucted on ihe su6jed propeKy ccnsistert �.vith the <br />site development plan on file at the PlanninglCommunity Development Department. Development <br />uf the structure, setbacks, buFfers and parkirg shall be in accordance wiih the approved olan �nd <br />��115 d�CISIOfI. <br />?, The residence shall be relocated so as to remain al least 30 feet from the stream and any yzrd area <br />,;; Ir-as, 25 feei from �ne stream. <br />Changes to accommodate Condition No. 2 may include reducing the size of the house and or yard, <br />and or moditying the orientation oi the hou,e and or yard, and or relocaliny tha house into the front <br />yard setback. For the latter, the house shall maintain a minimum front yard sethack oi 15 feet, <br />3 <br />